BetaArchive Logo
Navigation Home Database Screenshots Gallery Image Uploader Server Info FTP Servers Wiki Forum RSS Feed Rules Please Donate
UP: 16d, 19h, 45m | CPU: 77% | MEM: 5403MB of 11705MB used
{The community for beta collectors}

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 3:22 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:02 pm

Posts
514
I dunno about versions I'd like to see released as they are (I've got more than enough to play with even now, and I don't even have a very large collection) but I would've been interested in what Neptune would've turned out like had they not scrapped it and I'd have liked to have seen a working version of what the supposed next version of Windows (which turned out to be Longhorn/Vista) would've been, you know, like in that video that's floating around?

Activity centres are an interesting idea too, though I'm not keen on what I've seen of them up 'till now... I wonder how they really could be used... maybe something like MCE would be cool too, but for everyday tasks...


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 7:41 pm 
Reply with quote
Microsoft will never release them though. :( I also want those builds.


Top
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 9:53 pm 
Reply with quote
I'm kind of noobish in the Windows OS departments but wasn't Windows developing a Windows 96? If that;s the case, it would be cool to see a release of that. :D


Top
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 10:00 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
3557
Bertie Bott wrote:
I'm kind of noobish in the Windows OS departments but wasn't Windows developing a Windows 96? If that;s the case, it would be cool to see a release of that. :D

This was one of the code names of Windows 95 B, the other one being Nashville.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 2:45 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Sat Jan 27, 2007 10:56 pm

Posts
601

Location
Vienna, Austria
One of my friends had an pc with an Produkt key sticker that said: "Microsoft Windows 96".. I told him that this can not be, because it has never bees relased, but then he showed it to me, and: Surpise: He was right...
Oh, and I'd like to have some longhorn builds...


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 3:57 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Thu Oct 12, 2006 1:47 am

Posts
557

Location
Lismore, NSW, Australia

Favourite OS
Whistler
Erm, no.

Only chance if it was, is if it was a Printing error, or there was a translation error (Which I'm pretty sure there wasn't.)

I don't care what you saw, or what you say, there was NEVER a windows 96 product sticker.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 4:36 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Sat Jan 27, 2007 10:56 pm

Posts
601

Location
Vienna, Austria
It was there... or do you think I am blind? if i would be, I wouldnt be here... He has shown the sticker to me...


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 4:47 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Thu Oct 12, 2006 1:47 am

Posts
557

Location
Lismore, NSW, Australia

Favourite OS
Whistler
I do think you're blind, because it isn't an Official Sticker from Microsoft.

I have EVERY single OEM and Case sticker ever made and distrubuted from Microsoft and there partners.

And if I'm wrong, please show me and others Proof of this said sticker, whether it comes from the Internet, or a photo you have taken yourself, because if it is real, then you do not know the value of what that sticker holds.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 4:50 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:06 pm

Posts
2393
It could have been a warez sticker maybe? Where did the PC come from?

_________________
Image


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:23 am 
Reply with quote
Bertie Bott wrote:
I'm kind of noobish in the Windows OS departments but wasn't Windows developing a Windows 96? If that;s the case, it would be cool to see a release of that. :D


I got to playing around with this build a bit a couple of years ago...
I actually found what looked like a mostly complete ISO of it that I
downloaded from a server in 2003 using internet explorer...
Found it to be quite corrupt, yet most of the files & directories outside
of the Win95 folder were still in tact, so I extracted the iso's contents
using iso-buster & re-downed the Win95 folder getting around & made
a custom Autorun.exe for it, & also made sure all links associated with
the Autorun.exe worked, I also made it bootable & edited a few inf files
& Setupx.dll to make it install as a full version, instead of the upgrade
that it normally only worked as prior...
It ended up an 85mb bootable iso in the end....
Also used an msbatch.inf to avoid the need to type a key in...

The custom Autorun.exe...

Image


Top
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 1:01 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Thu Oct 12, 2006 1:47 am

Posts
557

Location
Lismore, NSW, Australia

Favourite OS
Whistler
Oh oh, I remember this from when you posted it on OSBA!

Good memories :D


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 1:44 am 
Reply with quote
is "Windows 96" a fake or real?


Top
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 6:11 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
3557
It's the code name for Windows 95B (other was Nashville). I said it earlier...


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 3:37 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
Offline

Joined
Sun Dec 31, 2006 4:34 pm

Posts
148
I would love to see Neptune released my MS. Build 5000 would be great :) that is if it even exists...it was discussed many times on OSBA :P


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 7:35 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Thu Aug 24, 2006 8:03 am

Posts
1115

Location
Germany
Yeah. Does anyone have this rare 5000 build?

_________________
"Theory is when you know something, but it doesn't work. Practice is when something works, but you don't know why. Programmers combine theory and practice: Nothing works and they don't know why."


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 12:01 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 4:30 pm

Posts
1524

Favourite OS
Mac OS 9.2.2
Luckie wrote:
Yeah. Does anyone have this rare 5000 build?


No. It was never compiled.

_________________
Image
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC; en-US; mimic; rv:9.3.2) Clecko/20120101 Classilla/CFM
"Stupid can opener! You killed my father, and now you've come back for me!"


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 7:52 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Mon Nov 27, 2006 9:38 pm

Posts
71

Location
Germany
Windows NT 5.0, I really miss it.

_________________
Windows "2000" is the worst OS ever, followed by Windows XP.


Top  Profile  WWW  ICQ
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 5:40 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
Offline

Joined
Sun Aug 27, 2006 6:37 pm

Posts
177

Location
UK, Home of RISCOS
That 96 one looks like a Windows 95 one with the mint game "Hover!" (which can be downloaded from vetusware) and coudn't that 96 sticker just be a misprinted 98?

_________________
Image


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 6:17 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
3557
ewan275 wrote:
That 96 one looks like a Windows 95 one with the mint game "Hover!" (which can be downloaded from vetusware) and coudn't that 96 sticker just be a misprinted 98?

In his post regarding the "Windows 96 CD-ROM", KenOath said he created the Autorun.exe file himself...


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 1:07 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Thu Aug 24, 2006 12:09 am

Posts
520

Location
Glendale KY USA
neptune most definatly


Top  Profile  YIM
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 1:41 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Sun Apr 01, 2007 4:32 pm

Posts
235

Location
New York

Favourite OS
Windows 7 Build 7600
I think that they shoulda release all of the longhorn build for us longhorn collectors. I really enjoy longhorn.

_________________
Image


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 1:46 am 
Reply with quote
Administrator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:47 am

Posts
12564

Location
Merseyside, United Kingdom

Favourite OS
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64
They should release all betas if you ask me. Its nice to see how it progressed and they're also good to collect. I also like it when you see a nice feature in an earlier build but it disappears later on and you never see it again. Thats another reason to keep older builds.

_________________
Image

BetaArchive Discord: https://discord.gg/epK3r6A


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 2:59 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
3557
Yep. I would love to have all the NT 5.0 and Whistler builds that were ever compiled, from the very first "pre-pre-alpha" to the last before RTM.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:43 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Sun Apr 01, 2007 4:32 pm

Posts
235

Location
New York

Favourite OS
Windows 7 Build 7600
but we will probably never see half of these builds mainly because microsoft dosent want to go through and release to there loyal fans. Id love to see longhorn 4067 or 5001 or 4088 but will we ever see these, most likely not because its microsoft.

_________________
Image


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 1:30 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
Offline

Joined
Sun Apr 01, 2007 1:58 pm

Posts
52
All the ones they've shown in the PDC.

They're all tend to be stable.

-S


Top  Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All views expressed in these forums are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the BetaArchive site owner.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Copyright © 2006-2019

 

Sitemap | XML | RSS