Vista 5728 on MSConnect

New news and release discussion.
Locked
Andrew
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 570
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:10 pm
Location: New Zealand

Vista 5728 on MSConnect

Post by Andrew »

Microsoft has just released an updated version of Windows Vista to technical beta testers. Build 5728 is available in either x86 or x64 flavors right now on Microsoft Connect.

x86
vista_5728.16387.060917-1430_x86fre_client-LRMCFRE_EN_DVD.iso, 2,622.25 MB

x64
vista_5728.16387.060917-1430_x64fre_client-LRMCxFRE_EN_DVD.iso, 3,628.64 MB

According to Paul Thurrot this will be the last Pre-Release build.

A new Vista preview site has also been put up by Microsoft

SeeWindowsVista: http://www.seewindowsvista.com/
MSConnect testers download at: https://connect.microsoft.com/windows/D ... oadID=3181

Now also available on the AbyssUnderground FTP[/b]

___
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1914
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:19 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by ___ »

ugh, just as i get rc1 in the mail....

___
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1914
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:19 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by ___ »


pr0gram the pr0grammer
Donator
Posts: 698
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:05 pm
Location: Or-stray-liagh

Post by pr0gram the pr0grammer »

Nice, public links

What exactly is new in this build? On Paul Thurrott's site he says there are a "few surprises on the road to RTM" but he doesn't elaborate on what those are ... all the screenies look very much like RC1. So, what has changed?
pr0gram the pr0grammer
BetaArchive retiree | OSBA Expat

Andy
User avatar
Administrator
Posts: 12628
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:47 am
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Post by Andy »

Downloading to the FTP

Andy
User avatar
Administrator
Posts: 12628
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:47 am
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Post by Andy »

Its now on the FTP, enjoy!

Grisa
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 112
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 1:14 pm
Location: Westbalkanian Computing Industry Wastelands

Post by Grisa »

Anyone knows, what's the difference between this and the previous build?

Btw. I won't use Vista as a main OS, until there'll be a n-lite alike thingie for this, and I can kick the waste out of it.

fzajac
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1432
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 2:45 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by fzajac »

I really like old LH builds and i have almost all of them. but now, after 5308 i dont see big difference with them. I like the aero from 4074. Thats my fav build ever.

tpemail
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 361
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:09 am
Location: China
Contact:

Post by tpemail »

They'll be a great improve to my collection anyway

And they also means some more DLs to buy...

Vista Ultimate R2
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 2393
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:06 pm

Post by Vista Ultimate R2 »

I know this rather goes against the grain, but I had a much better experience with Beta 2 than this new build. Beta 2 installed and ran fine, with all the VMware hardware installed automatically during setup (except sound as Vista doesn't support VMware's sound card).

However, I downloaded 5728 from Microsoft's public links, and immediately found that I couldn't install it in the usual way - it booted from the DVD, let me select the language and click Install Now, but then said "A required CD/DVD drive device is missing" and stopped there. So instead I installed it from within an existing VMware Windows installation, which seemed to work OK (although it took hours and hours, while Beta 2 was really quick (direct from the DVD, not from another Windows). But then I find that there is no CD drive and no Ethernet card installed in Vista (despite them working in Beta 2), so I'm pretty limited - I can't install VMware Tools, can't install any drivers and I can't activate! It also feels slow compared with Beta 2, but that could be the lack of VMware Tools as that usually speeds things up a bit.

Also, is anyone else worried by the mess that the Classic Start Menu is in, weeks away from the RTM? A mixture of XP, Longhorn 4074 and Vista icons, a very poor quality left-hand band where it says “Windows Vista” (for some reason they also use a very grainy image in XP, 2003 and WinFLP), and in the Customise dialog for the Classic menu there’s an XP icon and a 95 (!!!) icon! I have told Microsoft about this, but they probably won't take any notice of me!
Image

expert01
FTP Access
Posts: 352
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 6:28 pm

Post by expert01 »

I upgraded from 5600 (I've been upgrading for the last several builds). Only problem is it booted up to a black screen a couple times during install, let it set and it was fine.

My only complaints are the lack of active desktop, and the power button on the start menu should bring up the XP style window, nut hibernate the computer. New users aren't going to find that little damn triangle.

Vista Ultimate R2
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 2393
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:06 pm

Post by Vista Ultimate R2 »

I got a blue screen after a reboot during the install - I think it said something like USB mode driver. Let's just hope they can get everything sorted in these last few weeks now.
Image

___
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1914
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:19 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by ___ »

Vista Ultimate R2 wrote:....Install Now, but then said "A required CD/DVD drive device is missing" and stopped there....
i got that with one of the pre-beta 1 builds.

themodernizer

Post by themodernizer »

pr0gram the pr0grammer wrote:Nice, public links

What exactly is new in this build? On Paul Thurrott's site he says there are a "few surprises on the road to RTM" but he doesn't elaborate on what those are ... all the screenies look very much like RC1. So, what has changed?
Paul wrote "few surprises", not "a few surprises". The meaning is quite the opposite.

There are a number of updated icons in this build, including the user folders.

baso
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 181
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:51 pm
Location: Czech, Moravia

Post by baso »

Nice but better build is 5600

Locked