BetaArchive Logo
Navigation Home Screenshots Image Uploader Server Info FTP Servers Wiki Forum RSS Feed Rules Please Donate
UP: 32d, 13h, 6m | CPU: 32% | MEM: 2507MB of 3947MB used
{The community for beta collectors}

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

which os is the best
Windows XP Home 4%  4%  [ 2 ]
Windows XP Professional 42%  42%  [ 21 ]
Windows 2000 28%  28%  [ 14 ]
Windows 98 SE 10%  10%  [ 5 ]
Windows 95 2%  2%  [ 1 ]
Windows Me 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Other Windows version 14%  14%  [ 7 ]
Total votes : 50
Author Message
 PostPost subject: whats the best (windows) os's        Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 11:21 pm 
Reply with quote
Staff
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:10 pm

Posts
2630

Location
Land of The Tea.

Favourite OS
Windows 10 Pro x64
Which operating system is the best?

i think it is windows xp borg its not an offical but its paked with apps


Edit Note:
This post was modified by Fireware


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 11:22 pm 
Reply with quote
Staff
Offline

Joined
Sat Oct 14, 2006 12:05 am

Posts
786
XP Home


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 11:31 pm 
Reply with quote
Administrator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:47 am

Posts
12410

Location
Merseyside, United Kingdom

Favourite OS
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64
XP Pro. It rarely crashes, it runs on the server hosting this site, and its stable :)

_________________
Image

BetaArchive Discord: https://discord.gg/epK3r6A


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 12:00 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
3557
You should either expand the list to include much, much more OSes or rename the poll to "What's the best Microsoft OS". Or do you think MS' OSes are the only ones available?Regarding the best MS OS, I go for Windows 2000.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 12:13 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:06 pm

Posts
2393
empireum wrote:
Or do you think MS' OSes are the only ones available?


What - you mean there's OSes around that aren't made by Microsoft? But Windows is the OS?! All PCs have Windows, and that's made by Microsoft, isn’t it? You mean some types of Windows are actually made by...someone else? Surely not?! I know at the moment not everyone uses Windows XP like I do, and there’s alternative OSes like Windows 2000 and Windows Vista, but as far as I know they are also made by Microsoft?

j/k :P

_________________
Image


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 12:32 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:39 pm

Posts
149
Windows XP Pro is the best Microsoft OS to date. (Vista won't be better). However, before XP I would have choose Windows 95. That was the OS that started the Start Menu, Windows Explorer and all that stuff that is in XP.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 12:42 am 
Reply with quote
of course windows 2000!


Top
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 12:47 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:05 pm

Posts
698

Location
Or-stray-liagh
Both XP Pro and Win2K Pro have been good to me, though I think I'll go XP Pro. Seems to be pretty stable, and pretty fast, and almost all my machines run it. Though I like XP MCE for its Media Centre. :P

_________________
pr0gram the pr0grammer
BetaArchive retiree | OSBA Expat


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:30 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:38 pm

Posts
95
I like my custom 2000 90mb disc I made for my laptop, and my custom 160mb XP cd I made for my desktop/faster laptop. Both of them have the basics I need to do the stuff I do, without all the stuff I don't need (I'd call it bloat, but its not really bloat, its just stuff that me personal won't use, but others probaby use)

_________________
Asus F8Sn-D1, HP DV2-1044CA, Asus EeePC 1005HA, IBM ThinkPad X40


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 5:16 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Mon Nov 27, 2006 9:38 pm

Posts
71

Location
Germany
Nothing from those you wrote, but from them 98SE.

_________________
Windows "2000" is the worst OS ever, followed by Windows XP.


Top  Profile  WWW  ICQ
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 6:13 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 4:30 pm

Posts
1520

Favourite OS
Mac OS 9.2.2
I edited the post and the poll so that it looks better, plus I added WinMe and "Other Microsoft OS"




Windows XP is my favorite for desktops

Windows 2000 Advanced Server for servers

Windows NT4 or 98se for older PCs

_________________
Image
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC; en-US; mimic; rv:9.3.2) Clecko/20120101 Classilla/CFM
"Stupid can opener! You killed my father, and now you've come back for me!"


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 9:40 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Tue Aug 22, 2006 3:30 pm

Posts
407

Location
Essex, UK

Favourite OS
Gentoo
Windows NT 4.0 or Windows 2000 Server for servers

Windows 2000 for home use :D

_________________
The better candies are in the cage


Top  Profile  WWW  ICQ  YIM
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 8:11 pm 
Reply with quote
Staff
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:10 pm

Posts
2630

Location
Land of The Tea.

Favourite OS
Windows 10 Pro x64
ive managed to get win xp pro on an 800mhz comp i worked xp pro can work on pritty much everything

thanks for adding more i dont know all of them


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 8:57 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
3557
I also got XP to work on 166MHz and 64MB of RAM, but it was a painful experience. Once I had upped the RAM to 192MB and installed a fast HD, it was not that bad, though. For "everyday" use, I never had XP on anything less than 600MHz and 512MB of RAM. It wasn't that bad...


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 9:50 pm 
Reply with quote
Administrator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:47 am

Posts
12410

Location
Merseyside, United Kingdom

Favourite OS
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Ive seen someone get XP on 8MB RAM and 12MHz CPU. Takes 45 mins to boot :D Required kernel hacking though as you can imagine.

_________________
Image

BetaArchive Discord: https://discord.gg/epK3r6A


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 11:53 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
Offline

Joined
Sun Aug 27, 2006 6:37 pm

Posts
177

Location
UK, Home of RISCOS
If someone votes Me they should be allowed on the forum!

_________________
Image


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 12:34 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Mon Nov 27, 2006 9:38 pm

Posts
71

Location
Germany
I only use Windows NT (TM) with Pentium M 2.13 GHz and 1 GB RAM. for older computers (- PIII) I prefer 98 SE and Windows NT (TM) dual boot.
For Pentium I Windows 3.11, NT 3.51 SP5 and Windows 98 SE

_________________
Windows "2000" is the worst OS ever, followed by Windows XP.


Top  Profile  WWW  ICQ
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 1:24 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
3557
I'd not run an unmodified Win98 on a P1, that would be too slow. I ran 98FE and SE on a P60 and a P100, it was a nightmare in terms of speed, Win95 or a 98lited version of 98 was much better however.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 1:31 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:38 pm

Posts
95
I don't understand how people can say that they "managed" to get XP on a machine with an 800MHz processor :roll:

I'm currently running XP on 3 PII 366's with 128MB, 256MB, and 384MB. And they are laptops. I use these computers daily, and they perform fine for what they are. 2.5MB of video ram isn't enough I know, but I'm using the Luna Desktop on that laptop. The other 2 laptops have 4MB and 8MB respectively, and they both have the Luna desktop as well.

A PII 366 has a lot more power than a PI 166, but I've run XP on that too before. It wasn't very good, but it ran, had the Luna desktop, and it wasn't an nLited OS (my PII 366's are currently, but before that, I never even knew of nLite so they were stock installs and they still ran good.)

I have run XP on, PI 133's all the way up to PII 366's (apart from higher speed desktop computers, ie, AMD Athlon XP 1800+)

Anyway, I always find it funny when someone says that a PIII 800 or something doesn't have much power, and is better suited for 98SE/NT4. When it's true, a PIII 800 doesn't have much power by todays standards, it's still a relatively fast processor. Combined with 256MB+ Ram, it can be very speedy, add more ram, and you have yourself a very powerful machine that can easily handle XP Professional stock. Let alone an nLite version.

/rant

That being done, I like Windows ME, it's an OK OS, it doesn't lock up nearly as much as everyone would like you to beleive. I've used it on many of my computers, and its far superior to 98SE IMHO, but it still isn't nearly as stable as the NT core (2000/XP/2003 being the best).

_________________
Asus F8Sn-D1, HP DV2-1044CA, Asus EeePC 1005HA, IBM ThinkPad X40


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 1:34 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
3557
@prx984
I completely agree. If a machine might not have enough power by today's standards, it still might have plenbty of power for other, non-demanding tasks. And XP will, as you've said, run fine on it. Heck, if you have enough RAM and a fast HD, XP will do good even on 300-400MHz CPUs.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 1:38 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:38 pm

Posts
95
8) Precisely, glad someone agrees with what I have been thinking for some time.

Quote:
Heck, if you have enough RAM and a fast HD, XP will do good even on 300-400MHz CPUs.

You should see my Inspiron 7000 boot up :lol:

Heres a movie of my laptop booting :P

_________________
Asus F8Sn-D1, HP DV2-1044CA, Asus EeePC 1005HA, IBM ThinkPad X40


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 1:59 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
3557
Well, it's my opinion as well. :)
I usually don't decide the question on the OS based on the pure performance of the machine, but also on my personal preference. I remember I once had a Dual P2-350 with 256MB RAM running XP and an Athlon64 (2GHz) with 1024MB RAM running Win2k. :) You'd expect it to have been the other way round, normally, wouldn't you? :wink:
BTW, your laptop boots pretty fast, yes... :) But the fastest I have ever seen is XP booting in Parallels on my Intel Mac. That's so fast you don't even see the splash screen, or only for 1/2 seconds... And Win2k only takes 15secs to boot... :shock:


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 2:42 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:38 pm

Posts
95
15 seconds to boot up is pretty damn fast.

My Latitude CPi boots much faster because the boot post is much short (less than a second, compared to the I7K which is about 30 seconds.)

_________________
Asus F8Sn-D1, HP DV2-1044CA, Asus EeePC 1005HA, IBM ThinkPad X40


Last edited by prx984 on Sat Jan 06, 2007 6:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 3:31 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:39 pm

Posts
149
I agree with prx984 XP runs well on very old hardware and I do run it on old hardware and use that PC everyday, though you can't play games with it :(

Just some friendly competition, here is my boot up time for my Toshiba Laptop (233Mhz, 64mb RAM, Windows XP Pro SP2 and all effects are on)

BIOS: 3 seconds
Boot Screen: 13 seconds
Welcome Screen/Desktop: 29 seconds
Total: 45 seconds


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 3:34 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:38 pm

Posts
95
Lol, my Latitude CPi boots much faster than my Inspiron 7000, I'd put its boot time in the 30 seconds area. I should time it :lol:

With my Inspiron 7000, I can play a lot of games, thanks to the ATi Rage Pro 8MB AGP 3d Video card. I can play games such as Driver, Flight Simulator 98/2000 at full graphics and Midtown Madness 1/2. I haven't really put many other games on it because I'm not really a games person. I do like driving/flying simulators though.

_________________
Asus F8Sn-D1, HP DV2-1044CA, Asus EeePC 1005HA, IBM ThinkPad X40


Top  Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All views expressed in these forums are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the BetaArchive site owner.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Copyright © 2006-2018

 

Sitemap | XML | RSS