BetaArchive Logo
Navigation Home Screenshots Image Uploader Server Info FTP Servers Wiki Forum RSS Feed Rules Please Donate
UP: 28d, 5h, 42m | CPU: 43% | MEM: 5498MB of 12227MB used
{The community for beta collectors}

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 
Author Message
 PostPost subject: longhorn 4xxx or 3xxx builds??        Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 6:19 pm 
Reply with quote
wich is more stable longhorn 4xxx or 3xxx builds??


Top
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 6:21 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Sat May 12, 2007 1:05 pm

Posts
5271

Location
The Collection Book

Favourite OS
Windows & Phone
3xxx wich has no/minimal memory leak.

If you want to run it as a main OS, get an XP or Vista because betas arent stable at all (at some computer there are stable)

_________________
Image
http://www.thecollectionbook.info
Subscribe to our Image for updates and like us on Image.

Reading Mode only, PM's possible.


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 6:25 pm 
Reply with quote
ok thanks


Top
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 6:29 pm 
Reply with quote
i have a problem on my nforce 3 lan chipset with longhorn 4074 M1, what can i do?when i install the driver than i have a bluescreen


Top
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 6:41 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Wed Mar 21, 2007 2:42 am

Posts
748

Location
Guelph, ON, Canada
3718 is pretty stable, though some programs don't work with it, another good build is I believe 4038.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 6:47 pm 
Reply with quote
i can`t find a leak of 4038??? have somebody a link?


Top
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 6:51 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Sat May 12, 2007 1:05 pm

Posts
5271

Location
The Collection Book

Favourite OS
Windows & Phone
I think he means 4039.
4038 is not leaked.

And get enough contributing posts and get most longhorns.
But try the public server section, there are some beauties on there, and doenst require contributing posts.

_________________
Image
http://www.thecollectionbook.info
Subscribe to our Image for updates and like us on Image.

Reading Mode only, PM's possible.


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 6:55 pm 
Reply with quote
ok, but i can´t go to the ftp server, i don´t have the acces for this


Top
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 6:59 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Sat May 12, 2007 1:05 pm

Posts
5271

Location
The Collection Book

Favourite OS
Windows & Phone
Try the PUBLIC servers:

http://www.betaarchive.co.uk/forum/viewforum.php?f=9

_________________
Image
http://www.thecollectionbook.info
Subscribe to our Image for updates and like us on Image.

Reading Mode only, PM's possible.


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 7:06 pm 
Reply with quote
all longhorn ftp server are down


Top
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 10:56 am 
Reply with quote
Too bad :(


Top
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 10:25 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat May 24, 2008 10:05 am

Posts
2045
I love build 4074, its also pretty easy to find on the net.
I find its incredibly stable for me, so long as you let it sit for an hour or so after install.
If you dont let it sit, explorer crashes like crazy and the sidebar leaks memory pretty bad.
Long story short, build 4074 is pretty stable.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 11:21 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Feb 24, 2007 4:14 pm

Posts
6612

Location
United Kingdom

Favourite OS
Server 2012 R2
jabster wrote:
I love build 4074, its also pretty easy to find on the net.
I find its incredibly stable for me, so long as you let it sit for an hour or so after install.
If you dont let it sit, explorer crashes like crazy and the sidebar leaks memory pretty bad.
Long story short, build 4074 is pretty stable.


Wow! That sounds so stable.
Have you tried any other build other than 4074, particularly that '3718' build? Maybe try some of those evil '5xxx' builds that 'aren't really longhorn'?

I'm just thinking that if you think 4074 is stable, you should try more builds. 4074 isn't really the best build in any respect, even from the leaked builds. It's just that it offers a reasonable mixture of features. I personally prefer 3718 myself. It's one of those builds that work, is surprisingly stable for such an early alpha, and can still look great.

_________________
BuildFeed - the ultimate collaborative NT build list - Windows Longhorn - a look at a defining Microsoft project


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 11:52 am 
Reply with quote
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Thu Jan 18, 2007 11:07 pm

Posts
422
For me Build 3706 is stable. I work on IBM Pentium 300 mhz and 64 MB Ram :)

_________________
I don`t know what i am looking :P
Image


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 6:38 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:16 am

Posts
725

Location
TeXaS

Favourite OS
Windows Vista Beta 1 (6.0.5112)
Build 5048 runs very well if you have at least 1GB of RAM, even though it's ugly, it's still functional and nice on your hardware (since almost everything was omitted from this build for the code reset.) I also found that most programs install fine on this version. I guess this could be due to the fact that it was so close to the Server 2003 core and hadn't switched over yet, so programs were able to find the appropriate resources to install. I kinda like it myself :-)


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 1:36 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Mon Jun 02, 2008 1:06 pm

Posts
74

Location
St.Petersburg, Russia
I've used 5048 as my main OS for 9 months! It's a quite good build! =))


Top  Profile  WWW  ICQ
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:34 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Wed Oct 04, 2006 6:36 pm

Posts
59
Beta_Vistaglass wrote:
I've used 5048 as my main OS for 9 months! It's a quite good build! =))


I'm not sure if this is a fair question here so mods feel free to delete if improper, but how have you managed to get 5048 to stay activated for 9 months? Last I installed 5048, I was able to kill off the timebomb, but AntiWPA detects a Vista OS and fails to patch leaving me with 14 days to activate.


Top  Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All views expressed in these forums are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the BetaArchive site owner.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Copyright © 2006-2018

 

Sitemap | XML | RSS