BetaArchive Logo
Navigation Home Screenshots Image Uploader Server Info FTP Servers Wiki Forum RSS Feed Rules Please Donate
UP: 1d, 17h, 26m | CPU: 52% | MEM: 4265MB of 10309MB used
{The community for beta collectors}

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

which is better
Windows 2000 Server (NT 5.0) (any) 21%  21%  [ 9 ]
Windows Server 2003 (NT 5.2) (any) 44%  44%  [ 19 ]
Windows NT Server 4.00 (any) 7%  7%  [ 3 ]
Windows NT Advanced Server 3.1 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Windows NT Server 3.50 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Windows NT Server 3.51 2%  2%  [ 1 ]
Other (state what it is in thread) 7%  7%  [ 3 ]
Windows Server "Longhorn" (NT 6.0) 19%  19%  [ 8 ]
Total votes : 43
Author Message
 PostPost subject: which is the best microsoft server os        Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 5:57 am 
Reply with quote
Staff
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:10 pm

Posts
2643

Location
Land of The Tea.

Favourite OS
Windows 10 Pro x64
hi which do you think is the best server os.
if thay are any more just tell me and i will add it

More options added by Beta Freak
Poll edited, Longhorn added by empireum


Last edited by Gnome on Fri Jan 05, 2007 9:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 6:00 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
3557
What about NT 3.1, 3.5, 3.51, 4.0, Longhorn? And again, you mean "Microsoft Server OS", right?
I personally wouldn't run Windows on a server anyway, but I like both 2000 and 2003 equally.


Last edited by empireum on Fri Jan 05, 2007 9:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 6:02 am 
Reply with quote
Staff
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:10 pm

Posts
2643

Location
Land of The Tea.

Favourite OS
Windows 10 Pro x64
and them thanks im on the dumb side on the force


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 9:24 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Fri Dec 29, 2006 6:40 am

Posts
1513
I love longhorn :)


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 9:56 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:39 pm

Posts
149
Server 2003 is the best Server OS (for now). It makes a good workstation (never used it for a server before). It sees to use less RAM than Windows XP when I look at it in Task Manager (after disabling services/hardware in both OS). It feels faster than XP as well.

This isn't a fair opinion as I have never used it for a real server role, I have no clue how well it performs under normal work.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 12:00 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Thu Aug 24, 2006 8:03 am

Posts
1115

Location
Germany
idontknow wrote:
Server 2003 is the best Server OS (for now).


agree :)

_________________
"Theory is when you know something, but it doesn't work. Practice is when something works, but you don't know why. Programmers combine theory and practice: Nothing works and they don't know why."


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 12:03 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:38 pm

Posts
95
I'm using Windows 2003 on my FTP server, and I'll say its fast, easy, and reliable. I had never setup an FTP server before, but I found this really easy to set up.

So my vote is for Server 2003

I'm also using it as a workstation that I access from my laptop around my house and at school, and it works great for that too. It does feel a lot faster than XP to me too.

_________________
Asus F8Sn-D1, HP DV2-1044CA, Asus EeePC 1005HA, IBM ThinkPad X40


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 8:03 pm 
Reply with quote
Staff
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:10 pm

Posts
2643

Location
Land of The Tea.

Favourite OS
Windows 10 Pro x64
i think that windows xp sp1 uses less than windows server 2003 win xp-89mb windows server 2003 125mb thats how much ram was used on server and xp at start up for me
i have not yet tryed longhorn what is it like??
ive got one server on windows server 2003 and one on win xp pro sp2 2003 worked better as an ftp server than xp pro


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 12:29 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Mon Nov 27, 2006 9:38 pm

Posts
71

Location
Germany
NT Server 4.00 Enterprise or NT Server 3.51, but I chose NT 4.00, because more Support for newer programs.

_________________
Windows "2000" is the worst OS ever, followed by Windows XP.


Top  Profile  WWW  ICQ
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 1:29 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
3557
NTS4/EE is unnecessary in most cases, the standard NTS4 is mostly enough IMHO. Unless you need the clustering, fail-over and >4-way SMP capability, of course...


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 8:54 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:19 am

Posts
1915

Location
New Zealand
never had to use any server versions, so no vote for me :D


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 1:23 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Sep 01, 2006 10:04 pm

Posts
1022

Location
The Ephemeral between existance and non-existance: AKA "being"

Favourite OS
Rhapsody, BeOS
I'd go for Windows Server 2003 because it is stable as a mountain, but i'd like to come out and say that I used Windows 98SE's Webserver for about three years :D ...
Therfore my vote is for "Other OS"

_________________
Image
Part Time Troll - HPC Enthusiast - Spelling Master - Old Fart


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:48 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Aug 19, 2006 1:25 am

Posts
590

Location
Israel
MS-DOS 6.21. No annoying compression, and it's the only MS OS that gets near Linux' hackability (XENIX doesn't count).

EDIT: Whoops. I misread it as 'best Microsoft OS'. IMO the best MS server OS is Server 2003, but I'd never use it on a production server, unless it's absolutely necessary.


Last edited by ppc_digger on Sat Jan 13, 2007 8:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 1:44 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Tue Sep 12, 2006 7:16 pm

Posts
60

Location
Sweden
ppc_digger wrote:
MS-DOS 6.21. No annoying compression, and it's the only MS OS that gets near Linux' hackability (XENIX doesn't count).
How's the TCP/IP stack in 6.21? :P


As for myself, I'd never use anything else than *NIX for servers. :)


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:48 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
3557
Quote:
As for myself, I'd never use anything else than *NIX for servers. Smile

Same here :)


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 1:19 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:02 pm

Posts
514
Server 2003 I think, but I've only used it as a desktop (4 years of Server 2003 evaluations ftw!). It's nice and snappy, very stable and isn't too heavy on the ol' resources yet is up to date with hardware and software compatibility.

NT4's nice but getting too long in the tooth now for modern servers (though I don't doubt it's still very very usable for most applications) and 2000's just lacking that extra little something that makes it the XP of the server world.


Edit: Err... removed garbage text :/


Last edited by moonlit on Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 2:11 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
3557
moonlit wrote:
NT4's nice but getting too long in the tooth now for modern servers (though I don't doubt it's still very very usable for most applications) and 2000's just lacking that extra little something that makes it the XP of the server world.

What does 2000 lack compared to 2003 that it fails to be the "XP of the server world"? I'd say it's just as fast and reliable as 2003.
And I'd like to know how people can judge a server OS in its native environment when they've never used it there?


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:46 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Sep 01, 2006 10:04 pm

Posts
1022

Location
The Ephemeral between existance and non-existance: AKA "being"

Favourite OS
Rhapsody, BeOS
I am a fan of 2000 Server because I own a legal copy :D

One of the issues I have encountered with 2000 is that php seems to kinda die when running some scripts :x

-=-=-=
Also 2000 does not as happily take advantage of multiple processors as 2003 does. For example when running 3DS Max I remmber having 2003 render notably quicker then 2000.

_________________
Image
Part Time Troll - HPC Enthusiast - Spelling Master - Old Fart


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:28 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
3557
I own legal (MSDN) copies of Win2000 Server and Advanced Server as well. Can't confirm or deny the differences regarding SMP, though, but it can likely be the 2003 kernel is more optimized, at least if we're talking about dual/multi core processors....


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:52 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:02 pm

Posts
514
empireum wrote:
moonlit wrote:
NT4's nice but getting too long in the tooth now for modern servers (though I don't doubt it's still very very usable for most applications) and 2000's just lacking that extra little something that makes it the XP of the server world.

What does 2000 lack compared to 2003 that it fails to be the "XP of the server world"? I'd say it's just as fast and reliable as 2003.
And I'd like to know how people can judge a server OS in its native environment when they've never used it there?


I'm not actually sure what made me say that about 2000... so... can I withdraw that? :)

I give my opinion on my experiences with certain OS' and even though I haven't used them in a server environment I've still used them... I've no doubt all the Windows Server OS' are still completely fit for purpose (in fact I wonder why more people don't think so) but for the most part newer is, in this case (and in my opinion), better...


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 2:45 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
3557
@moonlit
Of course you can withdraw – I mean, it's a subjective opinion, no offense intended. I was just asking because I couldn't quite understand what your point was about, exactly.
And I asked about the value of judging a server OS when it's not been used in a server environment because... well, it's like comparing a Ferrari and a Corvette or something like that and saying the Ferrari is better because it's more suitable for buying breakfast in the morning, i.e. driving to the bakery at 20mph. Do you understand what I mean? Just as you have to test sports cars on a race track, you have to use server OSes as servers to form a valid opinion. Just my $0.02.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 12:48 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:02 pm

Posts
514
Heheh, excuse my late response...

Totally understand what you mean though, it wouldn't make sense for me to say "Windows x is the bext OS for servers..." if I'd never used it in a server/networking environment... On saying that though, the question isn't so much that, more "Which is the best Windows server OS?" ;)


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 1:43 am 
Reply with quote
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Thu Jan 18, 2007 11:07 pm

Posts
422
Windows Server 2003 is very good Server :)


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:19 am 
Reply with quote
Staff
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:10 pm

Posts
2643

Location
Land of The Tea.

Favourite OS
Windows 10 Pro x64
you cant get any better the win server 2003 ive got 2 servers running it its the best

_________________
Image
| Personal site - Social links - PC setup | TF2 Game Servers |
Liking traps isn't gay, its not gay if it looks like a girl
I-i-it's n-not as if I wanted to ban you or anything. B-baka. (「・ω・)「


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:22 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
3557
toshua123 wrote:
you cant get any better the win server 2003 ive got 2 servers running it its the best

The best Microsoft server OS, maybe...
The best server OS altogether... No.
And don't forget Longhorn is about to appear... Or so I think.


Top  Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All views expressed in these forums are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the BetaArchive site owner.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Copyright © 2006-2018

 

Sitemap | XML | RSS