BetaArchive Logo
Navigation Home Screenshots Image Uploader Server Info FTP Servers Wiki Forum RSS Feed Rules Please Donate
UP: 52d, 3h, 59m | CPU: 13% | MEM: 6204MB of 11090MB used
{The community for beta collectors}

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 PostPost subject: Windows Powered Edition        Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 1:17 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
Offline

Joined
Sat Nov 11, 2006 5:53 pm

Posts
342

Location
Saint-Henri, Montréal, Québec

Favourite OS
Chicago (hometown pride)
This seems like a hoax. But I thought I would run it by you guys.
http://www.classicbeta.com/Windows:Powered


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 1:25 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Sat Aug 19, 2006 7:45 pm

Posts
550
That's real all right.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 7:19 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
3557
Yep, that's real. It's based on Windows 2000 (Server) and run by NAS-like devices, IIRC.
http://betaarchive.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?p=876#876


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 11:29 pm 
Reply with quote
Has anyone yet validated that KenOath actually owned an iso of this yet?
Or was this just another of his hacks to show?
Reason I ask is i have yet to see a valid iso of this operating system,
not someone's Reshacked attempt.

If so, what is the iso's label.


Last edited by unblestone on Sun Dec 03, 2006 3:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 11:43 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Tue Sep 12, 2006 7:16 pm

Posts
60

Location
Sweden
I'd say KenOath's copy is quite real. Experience from ye olde OSBA tells me that KenOath is hardly the guy to try to fool us with something like that.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 11:53 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
3557
I think KenOath has many goodies others (=other collectors) can only dream of...


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 12:27 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
Offline

Joined
Sat Nov 11, 2006 5:53 pm

Posts
342

Location
Saint-Henri, Montréal, Québec

Favourite OS
Chicago (hometown pride)
The OSBA inside me tells me KenOath has a real copy of this, but I would settle for a change of screenies.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 1:26 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:39 pm

Posts
149
One day I was playing with Reshack on the Windows 2000 logon.scr. When I clicked on the bitmaps to see what I can change. I found an entry that has a picture that said Windows Powered. I guess this proves its existance.

However I lost my 2000 disk, and it does not appear on the server disk. If someone here has a copy of Windows 2000 Pro, they can check it. I'm going to see if I have the disk. I'll edit this post if I find out I was going crazy.

You need Windows 2000 Pro, not server.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 2:20 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
3557
I have also found these bitmaps on the Windows 2000 Pro and Server discs. Therefore, Windows Powered has to be real. They're not just in the logon.scr file, they are also in the msgina.dll and other files that make up the logon screen appearance and stuff like that. It's also in the ntoskrnl.exe (the boot screen). So, the question is: Is it possible to rebrand Windows 2000 Server to Windows Powered, if not, where to get it? All I could get was a reshacked rebranded Windows 2000 Server that pretended to be Windows Powered.

edit: These below are in Windows 2000 Server, and I bet in any other edition of 2000 as well.

Image

Image

Image

Image


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 8:51 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
Offline

Joined
Sat Nov 11, 2006 5:53 pm

Posts
342

Location
Saint-Henri, Montréal, Québec

Favourite OS
Chicago (hometown pride)
just like ^^ said, we need to release a tool to convert the installation


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 8:58 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
3557
Yes, I've done that once using Reshacker, but

a) this will only change the logos, meaning
    a) it's not a real Windows Powered Edition
    b) installing any patches may undo the changes

b) this will not perform any other changes that might be implemented in Windows Powered Edition (any limitations or special functions and something like that).


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 8:15 pm 
Reply with quote
unblestone wrote:
Has anyone yet validated that KenOath actually owned an iso of this yet?
Or was this just another of his hacks to show?
Reason I ask is i have yet to see a valid iso of this operating system,
not someone's Reshacked attempt.

If so, what is the iso's label.

So - are you here to simply make my time here miserable by debunking
anything I say or do,{as was the case on OSBA} or was there a point
to that post that I missed...
Did you not see the screenshots of it empireum posted the link to
on the 3rd post..
The screenshot clearly states that it is Service Pack 1, RC 1.128 ...
Service pack one files don't include { or ever included }
Windows Powered updated files as it wasn't released until just before
service pack 2, similar to Datacenter Server...
That pretty much concludes the authenticity of this operating system...
& seeing your here I doubt i'll be releasing it any time soon...


Top
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 7:50 am 
Reply with quote
sorry for replying this old topic, but i think its important, theres also a chinese version of this, heres the bootscreen:

Image

found in a chinese version of 2000 advanced server

edit, ive read it was released 2003, is that true?


Top
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 10:36 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
3557
Namronia wrote:
edit, ive read it was released 2003, is that true?

I doubt it. The first official version seems to be based on Win2k SP1 which was released around August/September 2000.

edit: Fixed the typo.


Last edited by empireum on Wed Oct 10, 2007 4:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 10:41 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:06 pm

Posts
2393
That screenshot doesn't look real to me, as there are no gaps between the blocks that make up the progress bar, and the blue bar that goes right across the width of the screen looks much less blocky than in the real thing (see the screenshot further up the page).

_________________
Image


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:07 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
3557
Vista Ultimate R2 wrote:
That screenshot doesn't look real to me, as there are no gaps between the blocks that make up the progress bar, and the blue bar that goes right across the width of the screen looks much less blocky than in the real thing (see the screenshot further up the page).

It also uses the Professional palette for the animated bar instead of the Server palette. Furthermore, the logo looks much "smoother" than the other version, i.e. it doesn't look like it's made of 16 colors. Those screenshots I posted are straight from the NTOSKRNL.EXE of a German Win2k and yet the screen says "Starting up...". Interestingly, KenOath's copy of Powered SP1 has the exact same bootscreen :?. But to make sure, I'll set up my Asian copies of Win2k and check for myself.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:41 am 
Reply with quote
believe me or not, but that was in my chinese windows 2000 advanced server ntoskrnl. i hope its released somewhen 8)


Top
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:48 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
3557
Namronia wrote:
believe me or not, but that was in my chinese windows 2000 advanced server ntoskrnl. i hope its released somewhen 8)

What do you want a Chinese copy of Powered for? :wink: The English one is the one we need.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:11 pm 
Reply with quote
empireum wrote:
Namronia wrote:
believe me or not, but that was in my chinese windows 2000 advanced server ntoskrnl. i hope its released somewhen 8)

What do you want a Chinese copy of Powered for? :wink: The English one is the one we need.


i want them all :P 8)


Top
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:29 am 
Reply with quote
We have a NAS running Windows Powered Edition.
I logged into it today to see why it was running so slowly.
Found out it was last rebooted January 3rd!


Top
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 6:01 am 
Reply with quote
whos "we"? :?


Top
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 6:41 am 
Reply with quote
Administrator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:47 am

Posts
12473

Location
Merseyside, United Kingdom

Favourite OS
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Namronia wrote:
whos "we"? :?


His family/household...?

_________________
Image

BetaArchive Discord: https://discord.gg/epK3r6A


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:16 am 
Reply with quote
Andy wrote:
Namronia wrote:
whos "we"? :?


His family/household...?

I work in IT for a chuch.
Sorry, should have mentioned that.


Top
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:26 am 
Reply with quote
cant you ask them where they get it from or only copy the install cd^^ 8)


Top
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:46 am 
Reply with quote
Namronia wrote:
cant you ask them where they get it from or only copy the install cd^^ 8)
It is a Dell NAS, came installed that way long before either my boss or I worked here.
I suppose I could see if I can find the CD Somewhere, but I wouldn't count on it.


Top
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All views expressed in these forums are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the BetaArchive site owner.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Copyright © 2006-2018

 

Sitemap | XML | RSS