BetaArchive Logo
Navigation Home Screenshots Image Uploader Server Info FTP Servers Wiki Forum RSS Feed Rules Please Donate
UP: 49d, 23h, 38m | CPU: 8% | MEM: 5737MB of 12227MB used
{The community for beta collectors}

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ] 
Author Message
 PostPost subject: Let's save XP!        Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 4:52 pm 
Reply with quote
XP petitioners: It’s time to raise the white flag...

Source: All About MS


Top
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 4:58 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
Offline

Joined
Fri Jun 29, 2007 9:30 pm

Posts
303
Why do people even try these petitions? Vista has already sold 120 Million copies. I don't think Microsoft cares about XP anymore.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:03 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:16 am

Posts
725

Location
TeXaS

Favourite OS
Windows Vista Beta 1 (6.0.5112)
...not to mention that Microsoft could care less about any type of "petition". LOL....it'll never happen. Move on and and use Vista.


Last edited by 4tified on Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:49 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:10 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 4:30 pm

Posts
1524

Favourite OS
Mac OS 9.2.2
This isn't news, and it isn't gonna work.

_________________
Image
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC; en-US; mimic; rv:9.3.2) Clecko/20120101 Classilla/CFM
"Stupid can opener! You killed my father, and now you've come back for me!"


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:27 pm 
Reply with quote
Men, I'll move to se7en, not Vista, but I love XP as MS hates it.

I'm really sorry for the topic in the wrong section, but I thought it was a news.

P.S. I don't mind about MS marketing.


Last edited by kontini on Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:56 pm 
Reply with quote
These are the reasons:
http://it.youtube.com/watch?v=QcMVqTTUs ... re=related


Top
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 6:05 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:06 pm

Posts
2393
4tified wrote:
...not to mention that Microsoft could care less about any type of "petition". LOL....it'll never happen. Move and and use Vista.

Yeh, it's not a big deal really - XP's been around for so long that there's millions of copies already out there, if you really wanted one to replace Vista with on a new PC after this date you could always get hold of a second-hand one.

_________________
Image


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 6:05 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
Offline

Joined
Tue Aug 28, 2007 11:18 pm

Posts
419
Will never participate in this. Basically the same conservative, old-fashioned opinions that we saw years and years ago after every Windows release.

_________________
Quod licet Jovi, non licet bovi


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 8:12 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
Offline

Joined
Tue Jun 26, 2007 12:13 am

Posts
229

Favourite OS
Windows 7 SP1
I think people also cried when Windows XP came out to replace Windows ME and 98.

It's too bloated; it's too new; it's not compatible with my hardware and software... We've heard it all before.

And the Windows 7 launch will be no different. You'll (along with thousands of people overtly critical of Microsoft) probably be begging for Vista to come back when that comes out. Oh, the irony.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 8:16 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:16 am

Posts
725

Location
TeXaS

Favourite OS
Windows Vista Beta 1 (6.0.5112)
XX55XX wrote:
I think people also cried when Windows XP came out to replace Windows ME and 98.

It's too bloated; it's too new; it's not compatible with my hardware and software... We've heard it all before.

And the Windows 7 launch will be no different. You'll (along with thousands of people overtly critical of Microsoft) probably be begging for Vista to come back when that comes out. Oh, the irony.


Amen.

Vista is a really good OS, but you need the hardware to run it and the patience to learn something new. If you have neither of those, than you might as well stay with XP. I was critical of Vista too through it's Beta 2 and RC stage, but I decided to stick with it regardless, and I'm glad I did. 8) :D


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 10:51 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
Offline

Joined
Fri Jun 29, 2007 9:30 pm

Posts
303
kontini wrote:

I lol'd at that.

#10, so do Linux and Mac computers (when moving system stuff)
#9, XP is even more dangerous since every hacker already knows all the holes (and when its obsolete, no more patches!)
#8 Same price as XP (for OEM and retail) :^)
#7 Um, DX10? Aero? Updates?
#6 Driver support isn't Vista's problem, its everyone else's.
#5 I've run it on Sempron 2500+ with 512MB of Ram and it ran fine. It was released in 07, so the hardware from 07+ is best.
#4 lol Vista is stable, you want instability, go use some off-base Linux Distro.
#3 All games for XP work, also only platform for DX10. If you wanna run CnC:RA get The First Decade or a 98SE install.
#2 Software compatibility is always a problem with a new OS, upgrade and move on.
#1 Vista is fine if you run it on decent hardware. 2GB of RAM can be had for $35...

Sorry if I sound a bit condescending, but its something I really loathe about hearing about. Vista is fine. Everyone was complaining about XP when it came out. What are alot of people using now? XP. :^)


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 3:05 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Wed Jun 11, 2008 3:45 am

Posts
628

Location
UK
I agree 100%. Most people who slate Vista are of the bandwagon variety and the closest they've been to it is listening to someone else who hasn't used it either whining about how bad it is. The biggest problem with Vista has nothing to do with Microsoft, its Nvidia, Creative and all the other peice of [censored] manufacturers who will use any excuse to flog you new hardware by pretending its the OS that is incompatable, when really any incompatability is determined by accountants looking after shareholders rather than the company supporting customers. The whole Creative SB/Xfi driver developement for Vista, or lack thereof, is testiment to that.

People moaned becuase of XP's lack of security, then when MS beefed it up with the advanced firewall and UAC, people just moaned about that too. You simply cannot please all of the people all of the time, and people hate change, even when it is for the better.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 11:06 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Feb 24, 2007 4:14 pm

Posts
6612

Location
United Kingdom

Favourite OS
Server 2012 R2
nVidia are probably the worst for making Vista look bad. A survey by Microsoft showed that they were the cause for something like 20% of BSODs. Intel and AMD/ATi were around the 10% mark.

_________________
BuildFeed - the ultimate collaborative NT build list - Windows Longhorn - a look at a defining Microsoft project


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:18 am 
Reply with quote
I personally am going to have to go XP all the way home on this one.
Vista does have some beefed up security, though. I've totally noticed that.


Top
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:39 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Sun Feb 24, 2008 10:25 am

Posts
224

Location
Yorkshire, England

Favourite OS
Windows 7
People will be campaigning to save Vista in a few years time ;)


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:41 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:19 am

Posts
1915

Location
New Zealand
hounsell wrote:
nVidia are probably the worst for making Vista look bad. A survey by Microsoft showed that they were the cause for something like 20% of BSODs. Intel and AMD/ATi were around the 10% mark.

it was higher than that i think


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 9:12 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat May 24, 2008 10:05 am

Posts
2045
vista is really not all that bad, the only problem i have with it is the poorly thought out and uncreative interface.

And i have a question for the person who started this thread:
Have you used vista, for how long?


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:43 pm 
Reply with quote
Staff
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:13 pm

Posts
1999

Location
United States

Favourite OS
MacOS 9.2.2
hounsell wrote:
nVidia are probably the worst for making Vista look bad. A survey by Microsoft showed that they were the cause for something like 20% of BSODs. Intel and AMD/ATi were around the 10% mark.


Wrong, Infact, on my Vista machine, I havent had a single BSoD!

But I dropped to XP :P

_________________
James *~*~* BA Moderator | Alternate History writer


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 5:11 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Feb 24, 2007 4:14 pm

Posts
6612

Location
United Kingdom

Favourite OS
Server 2012 R2
WildEye001 wrote:
hounsell wrote:
nVidia are probably the worst for making Vista look bad. A survey by Microsoft showed that they were the cause for something like 20% of BSODs. Intel and AMD/ATi were around the 10% mark.


Wrong, Infact, on my Vista machine, I havent had a single BSoD!

But I dropped to XP :P


It doesn't make a difference that you haven't had a BSoD.. The fact (as reported by Microsoft) is most BSoDs of Vista are caused by nVidia drivers.

_________________
BuildFeed - the ultimate collaborative NT build list - Windows Longhorn - a look at a defining Microsoft project


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 10:01 am 
Reply with quote
Permanently Banned
Offline

Joined
Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:09 am

Posts
463
TechRat8r wrote:
I personally am going to have to go XP all the way home on this one.
Vista does have some beefed up security, though. I've totally noticed that.


Try again. Their "beefier security" is also prone to a crapton of exploits.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 10:38 am 
Reply with quote
Administrator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:47 am

Posts
12465

Location
Merseyside, United Kingdom

Favourite OS
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Zimmy wrote:
TechRat8r wrote:
I personally am going to have to go XP all the way home on this one.
Vista does have some beefed up security, though. I've totally noticed that.


Try again. Their "beefier security" is also prone to a crapton of exploits.


I disable all the security. I think its pointless but most of all annoying. XP has given me no troubles with no security so why should Vista?

_________________
Image

BetaArchive Discord: https://discord.gg/epK3r6A


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 8:36 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Tue Jun 17, 2008 12:47 am

Posts
28

Location
Friul, Italy
The only thing I have against Vista is UAC. If I turn it off, it won't annoy me, but some of my software won't start without it.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 8:26 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
Offline

Joined
Sun Jul 20, 2008 7:18 pm

Posts
342

Location
France
I think we need to save XPs because peoples like me who have old PCs can't install vista ;)

And I don't have enough money for buy a computer , i'm a teen :P


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 10:57 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri May 18, 2007 9:39 am

Posts
953

Location
My house
arthmx wrote:
I think we need to save XPs because peoples like me who have old PCs can't install vista ;)

And I don't have enough money for buy a computer , i'm a teen :P

No one's forcing you to upgrade since Microsoft still fully support Windows XP. They'll go into "extended support" in 2009 and that's when they'll want you to upgrade. You'll have plenty of time to earn some $$$ between now and then to get a new computer. Besides, even when mainstream support is over, still, no one's forcing you to upgrade.

_________________
Image


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 11:01 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 4:30 pm

Posts
1524

Favourite OS
Mac OS 9.2.2
Well, Nathan Lineback still runs Windows 95...
http://toastytech.com/about/computers.html

Extended Support for that ended in 2001, and it still works fine.

_________________
Image
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC; en-US; mimic; rv:9.3.2) Clecko/20120101 Classilla/CFM
"Stupid can opener! You killed my father, and now you've come back for me!"


Top  Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ] 




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Battler and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All views expressed in these forums are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the BetaArchive site owner.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Copyright © 2006-2018

 

Sitemap | XML | RSS