A Windows version you wish MS had released publicly

Discuss Windows 2000, NT, XP and Windows Server 2000, 2003, SBS 2003.
ewan275
FTP Access
Posts: 177
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 6:37 pm
Location: UK, Home of RISCOS

A Windows version you wish MS had released publicly

Post by ewan275 »

I was wondering if anyone has a version of windows that could have been a sucess, but MS never released, Mine is Windows XP FLP it would have sold as a Windows XP "Basic" as not many people me included would want all the extra la de da eye candy on windows XP pro.

Edit made title make more sense
Last edited by ewan275 on Sat Feb 03, 2007 10:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image

empireum
Donator
Posts: 3557
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Post by empireum »

Yep, FLP for me as well. I think it wouldn't have been too bad if MS had released it generally. Okay, it's available for you "if you know where to look" and the fact it doesn't contain any activation makes it even easier.

Other than that, we need to ask which versions are there that cannot be bought, I can think of:
  • Windows XP Professional "Corporate"
    Windows Datacenter
    Windows Vista Enterprise
And TBH, none of these (maybe except "XP-Corp") are of interest to the general customer, I'd say. And if "XP-Corp" was available, they could scrap WPA altogether.

ewan275
FTP Access
Posts: 177
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 6:37 pm
Location: UK, Home of RISCOS

Post by ewan275 »

Good Point, all this Windows Genuine Advantage Stuff has put people off downloading updates such as IE7 and I know people whos OEM versions that came preinstalled are being hounded by WGA star logo, whenever MS attemps to introduce some new flashy anti poracy measure genuime users somtimes get ettfected.
Image

tpemail
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 361
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:09 am
Location: China
Contact:

Post by tpemail »

I'd say Neptune.....I really hate WinXP in any ways.....
Image

pr0gram the pr0grammer
Donator
Posts: 698
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:05 pm
Location: Or-stray-liagh

Post by pr0gram the pr0grammer »

What if they melded together a few existing OSes? How about a corporate version of XP Professional, plus the Media Centre and Tablet PC components. Plus the image-based setup of WinFLP.

Won't Microsoft please think of the geeks?!
pr0gram the pr0grammer
BetaArchive retiree | OSBA Expat

KenOath

Post by KenOath »

I rather wished Neptune had gone further than it did....
pr0gram the pr0grammer wrote:What if they melded together a few existing OSes? How about a corporate version of XP Professional, plus the Media Centre and Tablet PC components. Plus the image-based setup of WinFLP.

Won't Microsoft please think of the geeks?!
You do know that Tablet came in a VLK version yeah.?
I'll up some screens of it I have here somewhere...

Maybe when finding the time I should see if the MCE add-on pack
actually installs on Tablet..!
Dunno why I didn't think of that before...

jimmsta
Donator
Posts: 806
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:43 am
Contact:

Post by jimmsta »

You can use MCE media to install Tablet, if you've got the right key. I figured that the only reason why the tablet components were on the MCE media was because tablet and MCE are one in the same, in terms of media...

KenOath

Post by KenOath »

jimmsta wrote:You can use MCE media to install Tablet, if you've got the right key. I figured that the only reason why the tablet components were on the MCE media was because tablet and MCE are one in the same, in terms of media...
Yeah I knew that, the key determines whether it's either MCE or Tablet..
What I was getting at was installing Tablet, then adding the MCE05
add-on pack to it { or attempting to } just for the sake of knowing if it's
possible, to make tablet run the MCE apps, the add-on pack says it
works on any version of Pro, there were even reports on OSBA of
members making it work on Home. {supposedly}...

___
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1914
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:19 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: An Windows Version you wish MS had released Publically

Post by ___ »

ewan275 wrote:I was wondering if anyone has a version of windows that could have been a sucess, but MS never released, Mine is Windows XP FLP it would have sold as a Windows XP "Basic" as not many people me included would want all the extra la de da eye candy on windows XP pro.

Edit made title make more sense
They probably would have done that if it wasn't for Vista

I would have liked it if they had kept going with the longhorn builds before they changed over

empireum
Donator
Posts: 3557
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Post by empireum »

There's apparently the possibility to get both the Tablet and MCE components running on XP and Server 2003...

http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?act ... 05&t=61070

edit: Fixed a typo.
Last edited by empireum on Sun Feb 04, 2007 5:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Vista Ultimate R2
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 2393
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:06 pm

Post by Vista Ultimate R2 »

Someone should make a custom Windows version that is:

-XP Pro VLK (no key built in though, as you want to use one that passes WGA)
-Media Centre and Tablet PC built in (installed for you when Windows is installed)
-Vista theme and Vista icons (ie every icon Vista-ised, unlike even in Vista itself where there's still loads of old icons!), and Windows Vista eXPerience Ultimate Edition branding
-.Net 3, WMP11, IE7, Defender etc all built in
-Installer as much like the Vista one as possible, Wim based setup.
-No other programs or settings other than the above, as I like to choose that kind of thing myself - the above are all standard things that everyone would install the same, so they're OK

I.e. it would be Vista Ultimate but without all the Vista bloat/WGA
Image

empireum
Donator
Posts: 3557
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Post by empireum »

That's a a bit to ask for I'd also like this thing to be based on Server 20003 instead of XP and to have all the security updates in it

Vista Ultimate R2
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 2393
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:06 pm

Post by Vista Ultimate R2 »

empireum wrote:That's a a bit to ask for I'd also like this thing to be based on Server 20003 instead of XP and to have all the security updates in it
It surely wouldn't be that much work for someone who knows how to repack XP into the Wim format and integrate the extra stuff into the image would it?
Image

empireum
Donator
Posts: 3557
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Post by empireum »

Vista Ultimate R2 wrote:
empireum wrote:That's a a bit to ask for I'd also like this thing to be based on Server 20003 instead of XP and to have all the security updates in it
It surely wouldn't be that much work for someone who knows how to repack XP into the Wim format and integrate the extra stuff into the image would it?
There is such a thing – XP Pro, based on the Server 2003 SP2 kernel, installation is done using the WIM method.

0vermind
User avatar
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:32 pm
Location: 255.255.255.0

Post by 0vermind »

Longhorn 3646 [ALPHA]
Longhorn 3663 [ALPHA - First known Codename Longhorn Build]
Longhorn 4067
Longhorn 5007

kidde
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 7:16 pm
Location: Sweden

Post by kidde »

In my opinion they should've continued their releases of the Windows NT line for various RISC processors, maybe brought the PPC port to OFW hardware without an NT Veneer, maybe released the 2195 of Windows 2000 for Alpha... That sort of stuff.

(Well, in reality, I realize how that would be a horrible decision market wise. Doesn't stop me from dreaming though )
Last edited by kidde on Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:19 am, edited 1 time in total.

XDude
Donator
Posts: 1518
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 6:40 am

Post by XDude »

Builds i wanted released

2222
2309
2545
3562
3789

3646
3663
3670
3678
3708
3728
4001
4006
4013
4015 lab06
4018
4019
4022
4030
4044
4050
4062
4067
4073
4080
4087
4088
5000
5059 (WinHEC 05 Preview)
5071
5086 (TAP)
5087 vbl_ux_ie7
5098 (TAP)
5101
5103
5203
5212
5219 idx02.060824
5226
5235
5247
5253
5268 (OEM build)
5276 MS Preview Build
5297
5308.2 (OEM build)
5355
5356
5361 (TAP)
5372
5382
5383
5421
5466
5479
5483 (TAP)
5485
5487 (TAP)
5492
5504 (TAP)
5505
5520 (TAP)
5568
5584
5700
5709
5717
5724
5733
5739
5754
5757
5759
5808
5824
5920
6000.16384
6000.16385

I hope some of these builds would make it to the public.

Bender
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1524
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 4:30 pm

Post by Bender »

Has microsoft released any other unreleased betas? No

Have they done it in the past? No

Are they going to do it now? Doubtful
Image
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC; en-US; mimic; rv:9.3.2) Clecko/20120101 Classilla/CFM
"Stupid can opener! You killed my father, and now you've come back for me!"

XDude
Donator
Posts: 1518
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 6:40 am

Post by XDude »

Fireware wrote:Has microsoft released any other unreleased betas? No

Have they done it in the past? No

Are they going to do it now? Doubtful
My point is to have them leaked by others.

empireum
Donator
Posts: 3557
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Post by empireum »

@XDude
The (Whistler) 2309 build you mentioned is said to be fake.

XDude
Donator
Posts: 1518
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 6:40 am

Post by XDude »

empireum wrote:@XDude
The (Whistler) 2309 build you mentioned is said to be fake.
oh, I just though of a bunch of builds.
no one really knows 100% for what happen between 2297 and 2409, so who knows.

___
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1914
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:19 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by ___ »

XDude wrote:Builds i wanted released

2222
2309
2545......

.....I hope some of these builds would make it to the public.
so what don't you want?

IsaacD
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 557
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 1:47 am
Location: Lismore, NSW, Australia

Post by IsaacD »

In a way, you already do have XP Pro with Media Centre and Tablet PC Support, most commonly known as Longhorn 3718.

Other then that, the only one I wish they would release is the Beta form of Neptune (Regardless of reports, it did pass into Beta form internally)

XDude
Donator
Posts: 1518
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 6:40 am

Post by XDude »

___ wrote:
XDude wrote:Builds i wanted released

2222
2309
2545......

.....I hope some of these builds would make it to the public.
so what don't you want?
everything... hehe

Jeff
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1004
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:06 pm
Location: USA

Post by Jeff »

XDude wrote:
___ wrote:
XDude wrote:Builds i wanted released

2222
2309
2545......

.....I hope some of these builds would make it to the public.
so what don't you want?
everything... hehe
You just said you don't want anything released.

Oh, I would have liked a public release for Windows FLP.
-Jeff

Post Reply