BetaArchive Logo
Navigation Home Screenshots Image Uploader Server Info FTP Servers Wiki Forum RSS Feed Rules Please Donate
UP: 32d, 10h, 56m | CPU: 34% | MEM: 2458MB of 4081MB used
{The community for beta collectors}

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 PostPost subject: Chiacgo 34        Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 11:25 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Mon Feb 12, 2007 12:50 pm

Posts
973

Favourite OS
First Edition UNIX
Someone said, a couple of years ago*, that they had a copy of Chicago 34 that they would be willing to share, but the zip file was corrupt. Has anyone here got it and managed to fix it yet? Nobody answered the post I made back then, asking for a copy :P.



*http://forum.classicbeta.com/viewtopic.php?id=6005&p=2

_________________
Have a day.


Last edited by Tootles on Sat Sep 20, 2008 11:30 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 11:28 am 
Reply with quote
Staff
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:11 pm

Posts
2607

Location
Germany, Earth

Favourite OS
Windows 10
Umm, the link is linking to another topic... you may fix that :P

And no, I don't have it ....

_________________
MS vNext: Windows 10 ESD Database - Windows 10 Build Labs - Windows 10 Update Archive - Office 2016 Version Tracker - Office Downloader


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 11:31 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Mon Feb 12, 2007 12:50 pm

Posts
973

Favourite OS
First Edition UNIX
Fixed it.

_________________
Have a day.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 10:15 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Wed Aug 27, 2008 12:52 am

Posts
890

Location
United States

Favourite OS
Windows Server 2008 Standard
marktuson, the link is right, but p=2 should be p=1, and the correct post is post 19. Anyway, I never, ever knew that development of Windows 95 started at May 1993, not November. Windows NT 3.1 probably wasn't even in RTM at that time. It'll be quite interesting to see what that build looked like, assuming we get that chance.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 11:45 pm 
Reply with quote
Staff
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:11 pm

Posts
2607

Location
Germany, Earth

Favourite OS
Windows 10
Thlump wrote:
I never, ever knew that development of Windows 95 started at May 1993, not November. Windows NT 3.1 probably wasn't even in RTM at that time.



Image

_________________
MS vNext: Windows 10 ESD Database - Windows 10 Build Labs - Windows 10 Update Archive - Office 2016 Version Tracker - Office Downloader


Top  Profile  WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All views expressed in these forums are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the BetaArchive site owner.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Copyright © 2006-2018

 

Sitemap | XML | RSS