Development of Chicago shell
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Tootles [ Sun Sep 07, 2008 11:55 am ]
Post subject:  Development of Chicago shell

Could the earliest stages be like this?


You be the judge, our lines are open...

Author:  The Distractor [ Sun Sep 07, 2008 2:06 pm ]
Post subject: 

"This PRERELEASE version of Microsoft Cougar is under construction"

Nice fake screenshot! (I just can't think it's real for one second)

But I suppose the earliest stages might be like that!

Author:  Tootles [ Sun Sep 07, 2008 3:17 pm ]
Post subject: 

Nope, it actually is a real screenshot.

EDIT: I've uploaded the warning.exe file. It is here: Enjoy.

EDIT2: Case on filename was wrong.

Author:  Namronia [ Sun Sep 07, 2008 3:24 pm ]
Post subject: 

           13       Q.   And you are referring to the code name

           14   Cougar to refer to the project.  And what was

           15   the goal of the project?

           16       A.   The goal of that project was to get

           17   IBM to adopt Novell's new DOS that we purchased

           18   from Digital Research.

that doesnt seem to me like a 95 prototype, or to you?

and if it is real, where you got it and what build it is? cougar 28 is faked if you dont remember it

Author:  KenOath [ Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:16 pm ]
Post subject: 

The warning.exe's a fake alright...

Author:  kichimi [ Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:47 pm ]
Post subject: 

You know would would be cool, a shell for windows 2000/xp/vista in the style of a chicago build ;D

Author:  Tootles [ Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:30 pm ]
Post subject: 

I made it using Borland Resource Workshop, out of Windows 3.1's WINVER.EXE program. I only didn't say before to prove how gullible the kids here are.

Out of interest, KenOath, how did you prove it to be fake? I thought I was pretty thorough.

Author:  KenOath [ Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:07 pm ]
Post subject: 

Edited out, done once & for all...

Author:  Tootles [ Mon Sep 08, 2008 6:24 pm ]
Post subject: 

I'm sorry if I've p*ssed you off KenOath, I was just having a bit of fun at the time, and only had warning.exe in the screenshot... just for it to be there.

EDIT: As to trying to find out how to make a fake; all I wanted to know was where I can't go wrong.

It seems that on here a lot of stuff I've said or done, or tried to do, has been either disregarded, disreputed, or I myself have been disrespected in other ways. So I've not made loads of contributing posts like some people. So I've not fixed loads of builds like Ken. So I've not got all the rare builds and arrogant autotheism like some certain person whose name begins with 'N.' Well, I'm sorry. I'm just trying to learn, and possibly reconstruct what I don't think I'll ever see real versions of.

I'd make a big fuss of leaving, only I'm not valued or respected enough for anyone to miss me, or give two tin parrots what I did, so I'll stay. Perhaps if I play my cards right I'll learn something. Perhaps not. Maybe Andy should have banned me after all that fuss that was made over my Windows 1.00 that turned out to be fake.

Thank you.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group