BetaArchive Logo
Navigation Home Screenshots Image Uploader Server Info FTP Servers Wiki Forum RSS Feed Rules Please Donate
UP: 0d, 8h, 2m | CPU: 47% | MEM: 1959MB of 2959MB used
{The community for beta collectors}

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 PostPost subject: Is using 98Lite to strip everything that makes Windows Me...        Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 3:53 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Wed Aug 27, 2008 12:52 am

Posts
890

Location
United States

Favourite OS
Windows Server 2008 Standard
Topic title was too long so it had to be shortened.

Anyway, I was wondering if it was possible if it was possible to use 98Lite to strip everything that makes Windows Me unstable without taking anything big from the OS? Or is there not going to be much difference so that Windows Me will still manage to live up of its true name as the Worst MS OS ever?


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 4:06 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Sep 01, 2006 10:04 pm

Posts
1022

Location
The Ephemeral between existance and non-existance: AKA "being"

Favourite OS
Rhapsody, BeOS
Windows ME is unstable because of its poorly written kernel... Therefore, you will get little help using 98Lite...

_________________
Image
Part Time Troll - HPC Enthusiast - Spelling Master - Old Fart


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 5:37 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Tue Oct 17, 2006 8:26 pm

Posts
929
I bring this up everytime I hear a conversation like this... and it isn't a troll, just a bit of insight on my behlaf.

Most of the instability of Win9x came from the mashing of the DOS and Windows mode applications in an unsegregated system. Even in a virtual machine, you will notice that bringing up a DOS window increases your chances 100x that you will get a blue screen.

With that, a little story. I currently have a Windows 9x development machine, needed a lot for driver development of custom hardware. Anyway, so I have a Pentium III 800 with 512MB of ram, with Windows 95 C, Windows 98SE, and Windows ME installed (using bootmagic). Let me give you a bit of insight. Windows ME runs faster and NEVER crashes. That is right. I am not pulling your leg.

I think the problem was, at the time of Windows ME release, that the machines they were installed on were the lowest of the low end machines. The hardware quality really made the OS look bad. Even I hated it. But now using a machine that is quality hardware, Windows ME never crashes. And like I said, it really is faster that its predecessors. A simple example is, the menu system. In Windows 98, I click a menu and there is a noticeable "lag" (for lack of a better word) for the menu to pop open (this is with the delay set to 1 ms). On Windows ME, it is instant. There are HUNDREDS of these little things that apparently no one ever noticed. Maybe only I notice because I am constantly booting between all of the versions AND they are running on the exact same hardware.

Ultimately, my advice is this. If you are having trouble getting Windows ME to run stable, try different hardware. It really CAN be a good OS.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 8:36 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Mon Feb 12, 2007 12:50 pm

Posts
969

Favourite OS
First Edition UNIX
RentedMule: Aggreed. I rather like Windows me, even though I hated 98. 95 was good, but seemed to me when I first used it (and that was the original 950 build) to be little more than the shell update I have since found out it was.

Got to be done: Windows me with the 3.1 shell and style. I am NOT talking about WindowBlinds, but changing it completely back to the 3.1 format.

_________________
Have a day.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 9:25 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Sun Aug 24, 2008 11:29 pm

Posts
43

Location
Southampton, UK

Favourite OS
Microsoft Windows Vista x64 SP1
I'm pretty sure with 95/98 progman.exe was included, can't remember with ME as that's when they started to change things.

_________________
We're all gonna die anyway, so what's the point?

Windows Vista Ultimate SP1 64bit, AMD Phenom 9950BE OC to 3.01GHz, 8GB OCZ Platinum 1066MHz, 1TB HDD, BFG nVidia GeForce GTX 285 OC 1GB, SoundBlaster X-Fi Fatal1ty Edition Champion Series


Top  Profile  YIM
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 9:33 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:06 pm

Posts
2393
Progman and Fileman were still in Me, Progman was also shipped with XP but replaced with SP2 with a dummy file that didn't run as the new focus on security with SP2 meant they wanted to remove anything that had not been updated for a long time and was likely to contain security flaws (you can still run it if you copy over the file from an older SP version though).

_________________
Image


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 9:36 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 4:30 pm

Posts
1520

Favourite OS
Mac OS 9.2.2
I've also run Windows ME for quite a long time, and its incredibly stable. Only crashed once on the laptop, and that was due to an old version of VLC..

_________________
Image
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC; en-US; mimic; rv:9.3.2) Clecko/20120101 Classilla/CFM
"Stupid can opener! You killed my father, and now you've come back for me!"


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 11:42 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:21 am

Posts
2068

Location
Australia

Favourite OS
Neptune/Whistler2419/Linux Mint
why dont you do the reverse, add the windows me gui to to windows 98 se, install win98se and then run this app to install windows me explorer,icons and sytem colours : http://rapidshare.com/files/141658744/m ... e.zip.html


Top  Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All views expressed in these forums are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the BetaArchive site owner.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Copyright © 2006-2018

 

Sitemap | XML | RSS