BPEdit HTML Editor 1.0 Release *UPDATED FOR 64-BIT*

Any off topic discussions should go in this forum. Post count is not increased by posting here.
FTP Access status is required to post in this forum. Find out how to get it
Forum rules
Any off topic discussions should go in this forum. Post count is not increased by posting here.
FTP Access status is required to post in this forum. Find out how to get it
Post Reply
benny1091
FTP Access
Posts: 164
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 10:51 pm
Location: massachusetts

BPEdit HTML Editor 1.0 Release *UPDATED FOR 64-BIT*

Post by benny1091 »

As some of you may remember, several months ago I posted about an HTML Editor I was working on for a few weeks (http://betaarchive.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3519). Well, several days ago, I finished the program. As a gesture towards all of my "friends" here at BETAArchive, I want you all to have the program before I make it generally available (i.e. post it to download.com). The program is freeware and it requires the .Net framework 2.0 or greater.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

You can download BPEdit at the following address(es):
http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/6/26/ ... tSetup.zip (~620kb)

Thanks for your feedback to everybody who gave it to me!

EDIT: BPEdit has been recompiled to support 64-bit processors and Windows Vista. Download link has been modified to accomodate this change. Your settings from an older version of BPEdit may not be updated in this version.
Last edited by benny1091 on Fri Jun 27, 2008 4:29 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Daniel
User avatar
Posts: 2607
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:11 pm
Location: Germany, Earth
Contact:

Post by Daniel »

It does not work on my machine ...
I use Vista SP1 Ultimate x64

Chicago
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 606
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 2:47 am
Location: $HOME

Post by Chicago »

I like it very much!
where did you do it?

Frozenport
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 1022
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 10:04 pm
Location: The Ephemeral between existance and non-existance: AKA "being"
Contact:

Post by Frozenport »

Using Vista x64 SP1 -> Doesn't work

If you are using VS .Net I would verify the "Target Platform" under "Build" is set to "Any CPU". If that doesn't work consider changing the Target Framework to .NET 3/3.5 because it maybe a Vista problem.
Image
Part Time Troll - HPC Enthusiast - Spelling Master - Old Fart

inxsfan92
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 544
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 2:38 am
Location: USA

Post by inxsfan92 »

thank you

been needing an HTML editor

Chicago
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 606
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 2:47 am
Location: $HOME

Post by Chicago »

I love it!

betaluva
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 2068
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:21 am
Location: Australia

Post by betaluva »

sorry to winge but why did you make it dependant on .net crap?

hounsell

Post by hounsell »

What's wrong with .Net? It's great from the programmer's perspective. It allows rapid development, thanks to the visual side of the tools, and is particularly great for working with HTML as it allows very easy integration of the IE engine to render the page.

Love the app by the way. Great Job

OG
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 628
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 3:45 am
Location: UK

Post by OG »

Looks a decent app, but as it's not working on X64, guess I'll have to stick to Notepad2+IE+F5.

stitch
Permanently Banned
Posts: 463
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:09 am

Post by stitch »

hounsell wrote:What's wrong with .Net? It's great from the programmer's perspective. It allows rapid development, thanks to the visual side of the tools, and is particularly great for working with HTML as it allows very easy integration of the IE engine to render the page.

Love the app by the way. Great Job
What's wrong with .NET? The fact that this took 4.7sec to bring up the first window on a first run. I dunno if it's .NET sucking dongs, or if this is just crappy code.

Tested on an AMD64 3000+ 1.8ghz, 1GiB ram, Windows XP Pro 32bit

benny1091
FTP Access
Posts: 164
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 10:51 pm
Location: massachusetts

Post by benny1091 »

What's wrong with .NET? The fact that this took 4.7sec to bring up the first window on a first run. I dunno if it's .NET sucking dongs, or if this is just crappy code.
I wouldn't say it's crappy code- I would say its your crappy computer. And rethink what you wrote- FIRST RUN. It's called initializing and writing settings as well as establishing links with required library files. Once again, think about what you write before you post it

Dion

Post by Dion »

I'd like to know what he used to measure the 4.7 seconds.

I'll try this app out later, thanks.

stitch
Permanently Banned
Posts: 463
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:09 am

Post by stitch »

Dion wrote:I'd like to know what he used to measure the 4.7 seconds.

I'll try this app out later, thanks.
Not the best way to measure performance, but without being able to alter code I used Secs, a cheesy VB program that costs $8.

Post Reply