BetaArchive Logo
Navigation Home Screenshots Image Uploader Server Info FTP Servers Wiki Forum RSS Feed Rules Please Donate
UP: 7d, 17h, 13m | CPU: 13% | MEM: 2245MB of 3609MB used
{The community for beta collectors}

Forum rules


Any off topic discussions should go in this forum. Post count is not increased by posting here.
FTP Access status is required to post in this forum. Find out how to get it


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Is this new server faster than the old one?
Yes, MUCH faster! 36%  36%  [ 16 ]
Yes, a little faster 20%  20%  [ 9 ]
I see no difference 34%  34%  [ 15 ]
No, a little slower 5%  5%  [ 2 ]
No, MUCH slower! 5%  5%  [ 2 ]
Total votes : 44
Author Message
 PostPost subject: So, we're on the new server, whats the speed like?        Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:34 pm 
Reply with quote
Administrator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:47 am

Posts
12400

Location
Merseyside, United Kingdom

Favourite OS
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Hello all,

Now that we're finally on, what is hopefully the last of changing servers for a long time, what do you think of the speed? Please answer in the poll or if an option isn't there that describes it for you, please post.

Comments and questions are of course welcome.

_________________
Image

BetaArchive Discord: https://discord.gg/epK3r6A


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:36 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Feb 24, 2007 4:14 pm

Posts
6612

Location
United Kingdom

Favourite OS
Server 2012 R2
A lot faster, im getting a ping of 30ms :|

_________________
BuildFeed - the ultimate collaborative NT build list - Windows Longhorn - a look at a defining Microsoft project


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:37 pm 
Reply with quote
Administrator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:47 am

Posts
12400

Location
Merseyside, United Kingdom

Favourite OS
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64
hounsell wrote:
A lot faster, im getting a ping of 30ms :|


I get 39-46ms at home, so its very good :)

_________________
Image

BetaArchive Discord: https://discord.gg/epK3r6A


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:39 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
Offline

Joined
Wed Aug 22, 2007 9:21 pm

Posts
458
Much faster now :D


Thats because Iam from Germany.


Ping is: 30-40


very good :D :)

markus


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:39 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sun May 13, 2007 12:42 am

Posts
2404
138ms Ping.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:40 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:45 pm

Posts
732

Location
Norway

Favourite OS
HP keystroke RPL
Fairly quick in use, I don't see a huge difference in speed though.

_________________
Let's sperg about hardware
E6410 - i5-560m, 8GB, WXGA+, NVS 3100M, Samsung SSD 830 128GB, WWAN, 9-cell, E-Port Plus Replicator
Desktop - i5-2500k (4.3 GHz TB), 8 GB, HD6950 2GB, 2x24" 1080p, Samsung SSD 830 128GB + 2 TB stripe, Xonar D2X


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:41 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 4:30 pm

Posts
1520

Favourite OS
Mac OS 9.2.2
I'm getting a ping of 100ms to 150ms. Not bad, considering I'm running 5 torrents, and serving files off of a server...

_________________
Image
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC; en-US; mimic; rv:9.3.2) Clecko/20120101 Classilla/CFM
"Stupid can opener! You killed my father, and now you've come back for me!"


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:42 pm 
Reply with quote
Administrator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:47 am

Posts
12400

Location
Merseyside, United Kingdom

Favourite OS
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64
With the server being hosted in Roubaix, France, its now roughly in the middle of the user base, eg, USA to the West and Australia to the East. This means its fairly fast to everyone and definitely faster for users in Australia.

_________________
Image

BetaArchive Discord: https://discord.gg/epK3r6A


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:50 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Thu Mar 15, 2007 5:11 pm

Posts
338

Location
West Sussex, United Kindom
I'm getting a ping of 25-30ms

Now that we are on the new server are you going to put all of the beta files on it?

_________________
|3e|\|

Image
Image
The Number One HTTP Server On The Internet


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:52 pm 
Reply with quote
Administrator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:47 am

Posts
12400

Location
Merseyside, United Kingdom

Favourite OS
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Apache wrote:
I'm getting a ping of 25-30ms

Now that we are on the new server are you going to put all of the beta files on it?


Not sure yet. I'll decide soon. Problem is I'd rather not have the server taken offline if the DC decide its unsuitable to host. So I'm still debating whether to do it.

_________________
Image

BetaArchive Discord: https://discord.gg/epK3r6A


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:59 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Thu Mar 15, 2007 5:11 pm

Posts
338

Location
West Sussex, United Kindom
There is that yes

_________________
|3e|\|

Image
Image
The Number One HTTP Server On The Internet


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:39 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:39 pm

Posts
149
The site does not feel faster, but then again it was never slow to begin with.

There was this one time when my ISP broke something, and I couldn't access most sites, including Google, Wikipedia etc, but this site worked! :D


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 3:10 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Fri Dec 29, 2006 6:40 am

Posts
1513
The new server is pretty good.
Except that sometimes, the page wouldn't load, refreshing wouldn't help.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 3:41 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:06 pm

Posts
1004

Location
USA
Andy wrote:
Apache wrote:
I'm getting a ping of 25-30ms

Now that we are on the new server are you going to put all of the beta files on it?


Not sure yet. I'll decide soon. Problem is I'd rather not have the server taken offline if the DC decide its unsuitable to host. So I'm still debating whether to do it.


Aren't our files hosted in the same datacenter anyways?

It's a bit slower on this end now, but I can't notice too big of a difference.

_________________
Old-Computer
BetaArchive VIP | Ex-OSBA Member


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 4:19 pm 
Reply with quote
Administrator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:47 am

Posts
12400

Location
Merseyside, United Kingdom

Favourite OS
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64
XDude wrote:
The new server is pretty good.
Except that sometimes, the page wouldn't load, refreshing wouldn't help.


Yeah I'm having a small issue. Basically I'm downloading the beta's from SP server as a backup, and once it goes over 40Mbps it drops the connection for some reason. I suspect the NIC isn't working properly. I've requested the datacentre take a look at it for me.

_________________
Image

BetaArchive Discord: https://discord.gg/epK3r6A


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 4:34 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Wed Nov 01, 2006 10:30 pm

Posts
156

Location
France

Favourite OS
Windows 7 SP1 x64
Well, this evening when the traffic is high ...

Quote:
C:\Users\Utilisateur>ping betaarchive.co.uk

Envoi d'une requête 'ping' sur ip.betaarchive.co.uk [91.121.17.201] avec 32 octe
ts de données :
Réponse de 91.121.17.201 : octets=32 temps=38 ms TTL=117
Réponse de 91.121.17.201 : octets=32 temps=38 ms TTL=117
Réponse de 91.121.17.201 : octets=32 temps=38 ms TTL=117
Réponse de 91.121.17.201 : octets=32 temps=38 ms TTL=117

Statistiques Ping pour 91.121.17.201:
Paquets : envoyés = 4, reçus = 4, perdus = 0 (perte 0%),
Durée approximative des boucles en millisecondes :
Minimum = 38ms, Maximum = 38ms, Moyenne = 38ms

C:\Users\Utilisateur>ping sillyproject.com

Envoi d'une requête 'ping' sur sillyproject.com [91.121.97.22] avec 32 octets de
données :
Réponse de 91.121.97.22 : octets=32 temps=34 ms TTL=116
Réponse de 91.121.97.22 : octets=32 temps=34 ms TTL=116
Réponse de 91.121.97.22 : octets=32 temps=34 ms TTL=116
Réponse de 91.121.97.22 : octets=32 temps=34 ms TTL=116

Statistiques Ping pour 91.121.97.22:
Paquets : envoyés = 4, reçus = 4, perdus = 0 (perte 0%),
Durée approximative des boucles en millisecondes :
Minimum = 34ms, Maximum = 34ms, Moyenne = 34ms

... my server still pwns yours Andy, lol ... :P

More seriously though, the site is soooo much faster now!
The old server used to ping at over 250ms for me!

See Andy, told you OVH was worth it ... :)

_________________
~ Dan


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 4:50 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sun May 13, 2007 12:42 am

Posts
2404
I second that.

Quote:
C:\>ping betaarchive.co.uk

Pinging ip.betaarchive.co.uk [91.121.17.201] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=137ms TTL=114
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=133ms TTL=114
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=135ms TTL=114
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=138ms TTL=114

Ping statistics for 91.121.17.201:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 133ms, Maximum = 138ms, Average = 135ms

C:\>ping sillyproject.com

Pinging sillyproject.com [91.121.97.22] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 91.121.97.22: bytes=32 time=136ms TTL=115
Reply from 91.121.97.22: bytes=32 time=132ms TTL=115
Reply from 91.121.97.22: bytes=32 time=133ms TTL=115
Reply from 91.121.97.22: bytes=32 time=136ms TTL=115

Ping statistics for 91.121.97.22:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 132ms, Maximum = 136ms, Average = 134ms


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 5:19 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
Offline

Joined
Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:13 pm

Posts
130

Location
France
Quote:
$ mtr --report -c 4 www.betaarchive.co.uk
HOST: chaos Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. 192.168.0.1 0.0% 4 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.8 0.3
2. 10.239.44.1 0.0% 4 64.4 28.0 9.0 64.4 25.1
3. 213245255193.chello.fr 0.0% 4 9.4 10.2 8.1 12.3 1.9
4. 087231194101.chello.fr 0.0% 4 21.8 23.8 17.9 29.9 5.1
5. s181.dhcp212-198-4.noos.fr 0.0% 4 94.5 98.6 87.1 119.0 14.0
6. 087231193253.chello.fr 0.0% 4 90.5 84.7 76.0 94.3 9.0
7. s029.dhcp212-198-4.noos.fr 0.0% 4 108.8 86.7 75.2 108.8 15.6
8. 80.236.0.37 75.0% 4 70.7 70.7 70.7 70.7 0.0
9. ip-134.net-80-236-4.rev.nume 25.0% 4 82.5 78.4 76.1 82.5 3.6
10. 80.236.0.118 75.0% 4 129.9 129.9 129.9 129.9 0.0
11. 020G.rbx-2-6k.routers.ovh.ne 0.0% 4 83.1 90.5 83.1 102.7 9.2
12. rbx-4-m1.routers.ovh.net 0.0% 4 86.3 102.9 86.3 129.2 18.6
13. betaarchive.co.uk 0.0% 4 78.9 90.5 76.5 113.4 17.0

$ mtr --report -c 4 sillyproject.com
HOST: chaos Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. 192.168.0.1 0.0% 4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.1
2. 10.239.44.1 0.0% 4 19.8 27.5 18.2 36.3 9.8
3. 213245255193.chello.fr 75.0% 4 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 0.0
4. 087231194005.chello.fr 0.0% 4 16.5 28.2 16.5 52.8 16.7
5. s181.dhcp212-198-4.noos.fr 0.0% 4 72.8 86.5 70.6 102.2 17.1
6. 087231193253.chello.fr 0.0% 4 113.1 89.7 71.2 113.1 20.6
7. s029.dhcp212-198-4.noos.fr 0.0% 4 73.8 97.4 73.8 129.1 27.7
8. 80.236.0.37 50.0% 4 117.5 94.5 71.5 117.5 32.5
9. ??? 100.0 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
10. 80.236.0.118 25.0% 4 80.4 88.6 80.4 101.6 11.4
11. 020G.rbx-2-6k.routers.ovh.ne 0.0% 4 96.9 96.7 78.3 126.6 21.4
12. rbx-30-m1.routers.ovh.net 0.0% 4 78.6 83.3 76.4 92.0 7.2
13. ns29013.ovh.net 0.0% 4 74.5 95.8 74.5 114.4 16.4



My ISP sucks !


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 8:05 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Mon Jun 04, 2007 9:51 am

Posts
298
:) its faster for me now(im in Australia)


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 9:44 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Sun Aug 27, 2006 11:03 am

Posts
386

Location
Australia

Favourite OS
Windows 7 Ultimate
I haven't noticed anything (Australia) maybe it's just my crap internet though :P 512kbs/64kbs.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:22 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:06 am

Posts
25
I wasn't here for the old one...but I don't notice any issues with slow speeds. ;)

-Kirk


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 1:57 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Fri Oct 26, 2007 5:12 pm

Posts
2461
Andy wrote:
With the server being hosted in Roubaix, France, its now roughly in the middle of the user base, eg, USA to the West and Australia to the East. This means its fairly fast to everyone and definitely faster for users in Australia.


So far its ... MUCH slower :|
24mbps/1mbps connection

Pings between 356 and 362ms, nothing else running on my connection..

:|


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 2:01 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:06 am

Posts
25
Happy Dude... I'm not getting anything *that* high...

Code:
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.0.6000]
Copyright (c) 2006 Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.

C:\Users\Kirk>ping -t betaarchive.co.uk

Pinging ip.betaarchive.co.uk [91.121.17.201] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=144ms TTL=113
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=113
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=135ms TTL=113
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=128ms TTL=113
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=131ms TTL=113
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=139ms TTL=113
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=127ms TTL=113
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=128ms TTL=113
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=138ms TTL=113
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=136ms TTL=113
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=127ms TTL=113
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=139ms TTL=113
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=139ms TTL=113
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=138ms TTL=113
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=126ms TTL=113
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=127ms TTL=113
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=137ms TTL=113
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=113
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=133ms TTL=113
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=113
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=142ms TTL=113
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=153ms TTL=113
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=141ms TTL=113
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=150ms TTL=113
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=147ms TTL=113

Ping statistics for 91.121.17.201:
    Packets: Sent = 25, Received = 25, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 126ms, Maximum = 153ms, Average = 135ms
Control-C
^C
C:\Users\Kirk>


135ms average ping over here. :P

-Kirk


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 2:05 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Fri Oct 26, 2007 5:12 pm

Posts
2461
Meh, still much slower than before :S

Edit: ping while most users are asleep...still bleh
Code:
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=357ms TTL=116
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=357ms TTL=116
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=360ms TTL=116
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=360ms TTL=116
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=360ms TTL=116
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=357ms TTL=116
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=453ms TTL=116
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=360ms TTL=116
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=356ms TTL=116
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=359ms TTL=116
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=357ms TTL=116
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=357ms TTL=116
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=453ms TTL=116
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=362ms TTL=116
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=357ms TTL=116
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=358ms TTL=116
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=360ms TTL=116
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=359ms TTL=116
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=361ms TTL=116
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=358ms TTL=116
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=359ms TTL=116


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 8:28 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Thu Aug 24, 2006 8:03 am

Posts
1115

Location
Germany
although I'm at dial up right now I noticed that the speed is faster now.

I will tell you the speed next week, when I'm back at university.

_________________
"Theory is when you know something, but it doesn't work. Practice is when something works, but you don't know why. Programmers combine theory and practice: Nothing works and they don't know why."


Top  Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  

All views expressed in these forums are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the BetaArchive site owner.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Copyright © 2006-2018

 

Sitemap | XML | RSS