BetaArchive Logo
Navigation Home Screenshots Image Uploader Server Info FTP Servers Wiki Forum RSS Feed Rules Please Donate
UP: 7d, 12h, 30m | CPU: 12% | MEM: 1794MB of 3431MB used
{The community for beta collectors}

Forum rules


Any off topic discussions should go in this forum. Post count is not increased by posting here.
FTP Access status is required to post in this forum. Find out how to get it


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ] 
Author Message
 PostPost subject: Windows Home Server UI timeline        Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 12:35 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:05 pm

Posts
698

Location
Or-stray-liagh
The guy who is in charge of UI design for Windows Home Server now has a blog, and is going to soon write a post about how the UI evolved, including prototype screenshots. This could be very interesting to see.

Quote:
So over the next several weeks I’ll be sharing the complete history of the of the Windows Home Server console, including the first prototype UI from my first week almost two years ago. Watch this space, hopefully you will find the look back informative and insightful.


The blog is located here: http://www.antosdesign.com

_________________
pr0gram the pr0grammer
BetaArchive retiree | OSBA Expat


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 9:39 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Apr 20, 2007 7:05 am

Posts
201

Location
USA
nice find!
I'll be reading it for sure
just curious, how did you find it?


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 10:15 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:05 pm

Posts
698

Location
Or-stray-liagh
The Windows Home Server blog (http://blogs.technet.com/homeserver/) linked to this blog recently, so I decided to have a read through the guy's posts. It looks interesting.

It looks like today he posted screenshots of the first prototype:
Image

_________________
pr0gram the pr0grammer
BetaArchive retiree | OSBA Expat


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 10:40 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:39 pm

Posts
149
I know it is just a mockup, but really Penitum 5 Proccessor @5 Ghz? How long will it take for them to realease this? Aside from that it looks good.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 1:36 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Sep 01, 2006 10:04 pm

Posts
1022

Location
The Ephemeral between existance and non-existance: AKA "being"

Favourite OS
Rhapsody, BeOS
idontknow wrote:
but really Penitum 5 Proccessor @5 Ghz? How long will it take for them to realease this?


Probably shortly after the release of the 5 Ghz processor... 8)

_________________
Image
Part Time Troll - HPC Enthusiast - Spelling Master - Old Fart


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 2:08 pm 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Apr 20, 2007 7:05 am

Posts
201

Location
USA
i think it was started before intel stopped calling it pentium 1, 2, 3, 4, XX, and before dual core/quad core CPUs with high efficiency were invented...
obviously now it would be something like "Intel Quad duo @ 3.0 GHZ"
which whould be like... :shock:
4 dual core CPUs with 3 GHZ each...
thats like... 24GHZ?!


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 7:54 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
3557
spaceship9 wrote:
i think it was started before intel stopped calling it pentium 1, 2, 3, 4, XX, and before dual core/quad core CPUs with high efficiency were invented...
obviously now it would be something like "Intel Quad duo @ 3.0 GHZ"
which whould be like... :shock:
4 dual core CPUs with 3 GHZ each...
thats like... 24GHZ?!

You can't add up the individual core/processor frequencies. And why should a simple home server have 4 dual-core CPUs? I believe even two cores are overkill for a dedicated home file, maybe web server.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 12:29 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Feb 24, 2007 4:14 pm

Posts
6612

Location
United Kingdom

Favourite OS
Server 2012 R2
No, having multi-cores would be pointless on something like that. Its only going to be doing one thing most of the time, and to a very limited group of people.

_________________
BuildFeed - the ultimate collaborative NT build list - Windows Longhorn - a look at a defining Microsoft project


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 12:49 am 
Reply with quote
Administrator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:47 am

Posts
12384

Location
Merseyside, United Kingdom

Favourite OS
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Im sure I could make use of 24GHz some how... :)

_________________
Image

BetaArchive Discord: https://discord.gg/epK3r6A


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 2:48 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Apr 20, 2007 7:05 am

Posts
201

Location
USA
lol ditto
my CPU is often near maxed out just doing "the normal" for me in linux...
though the only time i did max it out was when i tried to find pi to the 5 billionth place... CPU overheated, system crashes.... XD

anyway, i doubt 5 Ghz soon, considering efficiency is the word now, no frequency..

_________________
Image

If you're havin' IE problems, I feel bad for you, son - I got 99 problems but a browser ain't one. - DJ Danger Mime


Image
include email


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 3:05 am 
Reply with quote
Administrator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:47 am

Posts
12384

Location
Merseyside, United Kingdom

Favourite OS
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Speaking of linux I just tried Ubuntu. Got bored after 30 mins after finding there were no drivers for my wifi card, and the only way to get it working was to use something where I have to type stuff into a command line for 30 mins. Not my idea of modern if you ask me. Why should I have use a shell/command line these days? I mean why can't linux be like windows and use a GUI for everything. OK, I accept some stuff is better in command line but installing a Wifi driver? Thats just crap. One more reason I hate linux. Windows for teh win.

_________________
Image

BetaArchive Discord: https://discord.gg/epK3r6A


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 6:21 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:06 pm

Posts
2393
Andy wrote:
the only way to get it working was to use something where I have to type stuff into a command line for 30 mins. Not my idea of modern if you ask me.


LOL :lol: :D

From what I've heard WiFi support does tend to be very patchy on Linux. There does seem to be so much Ubuntu hype around at the moment though, what with the release of the new version. I'm still not tempted to try it though - I'm going to be formatting my PC in the next few weeks when I move over to Vista (I was going to do it a few days ago but found LaptopVideo2Go was down, and that is the best source of graphics drivers that actually work, so I'm waiting for it to come back), but the only OSes that will be going on are XP Pro and Vista Business :)

_________________
Image


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 9:40 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Apr 20, 2007 7:05 am

Posts
201

Location
USA
Andy wrote:
Speaking of linux I just tried Ubuntu. Got bored after 30 mins after finding there were no drivers for my wifi card, and the only way to get it working was to use something where I have to type stuff into a command line for 30 mins. Not my idea of modern if you ask me. Why should I have use a shell/command line these days? I mean why can't linux be like windows and use a GUI for everything. OK, I accept some stuff is better in command line but installing a Wifi driver? Thats just crap. One more reason I hate linux. Windows for teh win.


I HATE ubuntu
its a wanna be OS which spread selfpropoganda...
it SUX
you have to do everything via command prompt and it is very basic OS.
Try Fedora 6 or SuSE
Fedora 6 has out-of-the-box support for almost EVERYTHING, or at least generic support that can either suite you or last you long enough to get the real drivers.
plus ubuntu BLOWS as a server, BLOWS as an OS and generally sux.
Linux is a community OS, its open source and its free, so it is superior to windows in every possible way.
Fedora 6 has advanced stuff in its repository too...
and it uses way less the windows Vista, but has everything and more that vista does.
Windows had an advantage and it lost it.
and now its loosing even more...
microsoft= :lol:
Linux FTW!!! 8)

_________________
Image

If you're havin' IE problems, I feel bad for you, son - I got 99 problems but a browser ain't one. - DJ Danger Mime


Image
include email


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:36 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
3557
Can we end that fanboyism, please.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 5:16 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Apr 20, 2007 7:05 am

Posts
201

Location
USA
The admin fanboyed Windows :roll:

So when do they plan to release this?
because i just installed in in vmware (pretty fast install.....) and it really wasn't what i was expecting..

_________________
Image

If you're havin' IE problems, I feel bad for you, son - I got 99 problems but a browser ain't one. - DJ Danger Mime


Image
include email


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 5:22 am 
Reply with quote
Administrator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:47 am

Posts
12384

Location
Merseyside, United Kingdom

Favourite OS
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64
spaceship9 wrote:
The admin fanboyed Windows :roll:


But Im the Admin, Im allowed to ;)

Anyway I only said how much I hated linux because everything is so difficult to do. I prefer to stick with what I know, eg windows.

_________________
Image

BetaArchive Discord: https://discord.gg/epK3r6A


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:42 am 
Reply with quote
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Apr 20, 2007 7:05 am

Posts
201

Location
USA
true. once again, its opinion. Windows is easier to learn and thus use, however once you learn linux, which takes along time, it is much more powerful.
So, the tyrannical dictator of BA is above the low law of miserable plebeians, eh? :wink:
naw, i'm just kidding.

how recent is the Home Server in the BA archive?

_________________
Image

If you're havin' IE problems, I feel bad for you, son - I got 99 problems but a browser ain't one. - DJ Danger Mime


Image
include email


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:56 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 4:30 pm

Posts
1520

Favourite OS
Mac OS 9.2.2
spaceship9 wrote:
true. once again, its opinion. Windows is easier to learn and thus use, however once you learn linux, which takes along time, it is much more powerful.
So, the tyrannical dictator of BA is above the low law of miserable plebeians, eh? :wink:

Indeed :P

_________________
Image
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC; en-US; mimic; rv:9.3.2) Clecko/20120101 Classilla/CFM
"Stupid can opener! You killed my father, and now you've come back for me!"


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 4:34 pm 
Reply with quote
Administrator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:47 am

Posts
12384

Location
Merseyside, United Kingdom

Favourite OS
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64
I think it was the first release of Home Server.

_________________
Image

BetaArchive Discord: https://discord.gg/epK3r6A


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:33 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
3557
Yep, build 1301 to be exact. :)


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:38 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:05 pm

Posts
698

Location
Or-stray-liagh
Prototype 2 of 11
Image

_________________
pr0gram the pr0grammer
BetaArchive retiree | OSBA Expat


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 10:27 pm 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:00 pm

Posts
3557
That 120Mbps WLAN wouldn't be that bad. :)


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 4:43 am 
Reply with quote
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sun Feb 11, 2007 4:48 pm

Posts
148

Location
UK
Very nice pics!


Top  Profile  WWW  YIM
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ] 




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  

All views expressed in these forums are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the BetaArchive site owner.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Copyright © 2006-2018

 

Sitemap | XML | RSS