BetaArchive Logo
Navigation Home Database Screenshots Gallery Image Uploader Server Info FTP Servers Wiki Forum RSS Feed Rules Please Donate
UP: 78d, 15h, 38m | CPU: 43% | MEM: 6425MB of 12287MB used
{The community for beta collectors}

Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 PostPost subject: NASA inks deal for ISS plasma drive tests        Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 4:38 pm 
Administrator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:47 am

Posts
12547

Location
Merseyside, United Kingdom

Favourite OS
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64
NASA inks deal for ISS plasma drive tests


Quote:
Plans to test a super-efficient plasma space drive aboard the International Space Station (ISS) have been confirmed. The Ad Astra Rocket Company, which is developing the Variable Specific Impulse Magnetoplasma Rocket (VASIMR), has announced the signing of an agreement for the tests with NASA.

The deal was inked on December 8 by Ad Astra chief and former astronaut Dr Franklin Chang Díaz, and for NASA by space-ops honcho William Gerstenmaier.

    According to an Ad Astra statement:

    Upon the successful achievement of the milestones set forth in the agreement, NASA and Ad Astra envision that VASIMR™ will be launched to the ISS where the rocket can be tested, for the first time, in its intended environment: the vacuum of outer space.

    The primary technical objective of the project is to operate the VASIMR™ VF-200 engine at power levels up to 200 kW. Engine operation will be restricted to pulses of up to 10 minutes at this power level. Energy for these high-power operations will be provided by a battery system trickle-charged by the ISS power system.

The VASIMR works by ejecting plasma reaction mass at extremely high velocities, much higher than a normal chemical rocket can achieve by spitting out combusting fuel. This means that a given amount of reaction mass does hugely more work, which could allow Moon ships to carry more cargo or interplanetary voyages to be made much more quickly.

The VASIMR isn't any use for launching a spacecraft into orbit, however, as its thrust-to-weight ratio is far too low. The planned VF-200 for the ISS, for instance, would generate a trifle less than the push exerted by a weight of one pound in Earth-surface gravity. However, it requires very little fuel to maintain this thrust for a long time, meaning that it can be used to prevent the ISS' orbit decaying without the need to ferry up big loads of rocket fuel.

Of course, unlike a chemical rocket a plasma drive needs electricity. In the case of the ISS, this will come from the station's solar panels. Solar-powered VASIMR ships, according to Ad Astra, could move cargoes to the Moon much more efficiently, or perform other missions at Earth orbit or closer to the Sun.

Further from the Sun, Dr Chang Díaz - an MIT plasma physicist before he became a Shuttle astronaut - believes the best currently-available solution for powering VASIMR ships would be nuclear fission. His analysis suggests that a 12-megawatt VASIMR vessel could reach Mars in just 39 days, for instance.


Source: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/12/17 ... _agreement


Star Trek anyone? :D I can imagine this turning into what is known on Star Trek as the impulse engine. :D

_________________
Image

BetaArchive Discord: https://discord.gg/epK3r6A


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 5:18 pm 
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:37 pm

Posts
2381

Location
United States
it think someone at nasa said they need something with a cool name lol. thats a nice way to keep the iss in orbit though.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 5:21 pm 
Donator
Offline

Joined
Mon Dec 31, 2007 4:09 am

Posts
368

Location
Sweden
The part about 39 day trips to mars sounds promising, the current time it takes to reach it makes exploring very difficult. Shortening the traveltime means that we can decrease the size of the vessels a lot and even have a supply route going until we get all lifesupport going on the planet.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 7:52 am 
FTP Access
Offline

Joined
Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:34 am

Posts
913
While this does sound great, in my mind a stargate would be better :D

And as for the part about going to Mars, I reckon that's still decades away.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 8:22 am 
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Thu Oct 12, 2006 1:47 am

Posts
557

Location
Lismore, NSW, Australia

Favourite OS
Whistler
ddew wrote:
The part about 39 day trips to mars sounds promising, the current time it takes to reach it makes exploring very difficult. Shortening the traveltime means that we can decrease the size of the vessels a lot and even have a supply route going until we get all lifesupport going on the planet.


12Mw Nuclear Space Craft Reactor is still quite some time away, I'm afraid. :cry:

_________________
Slavic Wog to the Core!

My Mark; Shall you RIP. 15/06/1960 - 11/04/2014


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 12:35 pm 
Donator
Offline

Joined
Mon Dec 31, 2007 4:09 am

Posts
368

Location
Sweden
Alexsis wrote:
ddew wrote:
The part about 39 day trips to mars sounds promising, the current time it takes to reach it makes exploring very difficult. Shortening the traveltime means that we can decrease the size of the vessels a lot and even have a supply route going until we get all lifesupport going on the planet.


12Mw Nuclear Space Craft Reactor is still quite some time away, I'm afraid. :cry:


Well of course, but the technology is getting there. Now we just need more effective solar sails or smaller reactors and we're good to go.


Top  Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6 posts ] 




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All views expressed in these forums are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the BetaArchive site owner.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Copyright © 2006-2019

 

Sitemap | XML | RSS