BetaArchive Logo
Navigation Home Screenshots Image Uploader Server Info FTP Servers Wiki Forum RSS Feed Rules Please Donate
UP: 2d, 19h, 35m | CPU: 21% | MEM: 1754MB of 3181MB used
{The community for beta collectors}

Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 PostPost subject: Windows Server 2008 R2 still lives        Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 1:24 am 
FTP Access
Offline

Joined
Tue Aug 28, 2007 11:18 pm

Posts
419
What do you do with a blog post that is so messed up that you can’t even go in and edit it in order to fix it? That’s my dilemma with my post from August 15 about Microsoft skipping over Windows Server 2008 R2 and proceeding direct to Windows 7 Server.

After sending me a note that led me to believe that Microsoft had decided to veer from its original plan of an R2 update followed by a full-fledged Server update, a Microsoft spokeswoman called on August 18 to tell me that her note to me was misleading.

So, scratch that Friday evening post. Microsoft is still doing what it had led folks to believe up until this point: A release called Windows Server 2008 R2 is still on the books (now officially slated for 2010). And there will be some release two years after that which may or may not be called Windows 7 Server. (Microsoft currently won’t say anything about the planned naming for this release.)

And just to keep things extra confusing, the spokeswoman told me that if and when anyone hears references to “Windows 7 Server,” what they really mean is “Windows Server 2008 R2.” In other words, the codename for the Windows Server 2008 R2 release is “Windows 7 Server” — which, based on previous Microsoft naming conventions, should be the codename for the release that comes out after Windows Server 2008 R2…. Yeah….

A comment sent to me by an anonymous reader, good old anonymous@anonymous.com this morning makes more sense now. (Note to reader: Why anonymous? If you don’t want me to use your name in a posting, I won’t.)

Quote:
“Okay, I don’t know how someone on our side could have miscommunicated this or if you are purposely reporting this incorrectly, but let’s be clear on this: Windows 7 Server is and has always been Windows Server 2008 R2.

“Furthermore, Windows 7, despite it’s rather pretentious sounding code name (a result of Sinofsky’s like of big round numbers) is NOT Windows NT 7, but rather 6.1(current builds are numbered 67xx as a direct continuation of the longhorn codebase). Put simply, it is not a big jump as a codebase revision and the new changes, on both the client and server, will be focused on user features, not core OS components. The big core OS changes are WDDM 2 and a kernel scheduler update to remove the simple bitmask enumeration of processors so that the OS can schedule more than 64 concurrent threads.

“Finally, and I can’t be more clear on this, ‘Windows 7′ client and Windows Server 2008 R2 will RTM simultaneously (and just so you are 100% clear on this) and are based on exactly the same codebase (just as Vista SP1 and Server 2008 are based on an identical core OS codebase).

“As for the next major release (meaning a full revision of the NT codebase) that will not occur until well after the current Win7 wave.”


So there you have it. Next up: Windows Server 2008 R2. To all you readers who thought it made sense that Microsoft was skipping over R2, looks like that’s not the case, after all. Sorry for the miscommunication.

(source http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1534)


So, 1) no Windows 7.0 but Windows 6.1 (it was predictable) and 2) Windows 7 Server to be released as Windows Server 2008 R2. After this I won't wonder if they release Windows 7 client as Windows Vista R2 :P

_________________
Quod licet Jovi, non licet bovi


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 11:18 am 
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:10 pm

Posts
570

Location
New Zealand
This news post has a lot of new information. Is Windows 7 Server really going to be (officially distributed, RTMing as) Windows Server 2008 R2, or is that its preliminary name?

If so, they better put some sort of glitter on the logo, or that product name choice and time of release is possibly one of the most boring I have seen.

_________________
Image


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:11 pm 
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Feb 24, 2007 4:14 pm

Posts
6612

Location
United Kingdom

Favourite OS
Server 2012 R2
It's annoying that it will stay as NT 6.1, but they insist on calling it 7. If that's the case, we might as well call XP 'Windows 6', Windows Server 2003 'Windows 7' and Vista 'Windows 8'. So why not call NT6.1 'Windows 9'? Same method of naming things with nice big round numbers. What the hell does he plan on calling the real NT7? (If there is one)

The more I hear about Sinofsky, the more I dislike him.

_________________
BuildFeed - the ultimate collaborative NT build list - Windows Longhorn - a look at a defining Microsoft project


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 1:25 pm 
Donator
Offline

Joined
Fri Dec 29, 2006 6:40 am

Posts
1513
they should all it "Blackcomb!"


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:43 pm 
Offline

Joined
Thu Aug 14, 2008 8:12 pm

Posts
30
So lets see. someone up in buildin #33 thought it would make sense to use 7 as the codename for 6.1........ how eastside of them LOL. typical I guess. :) They used those same conventions with some of the 360 stuff as well.


:?

_________________
From BA to OSBA to BAuk to...............?


Top  Profile  ICQ  YIM
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 5:08 pm 
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Jun 13, 2008 10:22 am

Posts
2366
Okay, so this means that the Windows 7 client and Server 2008 R2 are going to be essentially the same code base? Just like Vista SP1 and Server 2008 are? So all she really had to say was, 'Server 2008 R2 is still going to be named so, but it will be the software we are currently developing under the codename Windows 7.'


Top  Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6 posts ] 




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All views expressed in these forums are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the BetaArchive site owner.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Copyright © 2006-2018

 

Sitemap | XML | RSS