BetaArchive Logo
Navigation Home Screenshots Image Uploader Server Info FTP Servers Wiki Forum RSS Feed Rules Please Donate
UP: 30d, 8h, 57m | CPU: 12% | MEM: 2330MB of 3971MB used
{The community for beta collectors}

Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
 PostPost subject: Sun's Niagara 3 will have 16-cores and 16 threads per core        Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:17 pm 
Administrator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:47 am

Posts
12410

Location
Merseyside, United Kingdom

Favourite OS
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Sun's Niagara 3 will have 16-cores and 16 threads per core

Quote:
Sun Microsystems looks poised to lead the "mainstream" multi-core race for at least a couple more years. By late 2009, the server maker should deliver a third major revision of its Niagara processor which will have 16 cores and an astonishing 16 threads per core, The Register has learned.


Full story:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/06/23/sun_niagara_k2/


Surely this has to be the Viagra of all processors!!!

... I'll get me coat :P

_________________
Image

BetaArchive Discord: https://discord.gg/epK3r6A


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:32 pm 
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Thu Jun 19, 2008 1:02 am

Posts
66

Location
Dundee, UK

Favourite OS
Mac OS X Leopard 10.5.7
Whoa 8-) 16 cores per physical chip? That will be absolutely beasting! :D

Unfortunately I don't see clock speed, front side bus or cache specifications mentioned yet but even if it was *only* 1GHz per core that would still be 16GHz per cpu :P

I suggest in six months time you ask your provider for a cheeky upgrade to one of these bad boys Andy ;)


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:40 pm 
The clock will be about 2.3 GHz but I don't think it will be faster as a 16x2,3GB=... :x . Open your calc.exe! :D


Top
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:55 pm 
Donator
Offline

Joined
Fri Dec 29, 2006 6:40 am

Posts
1513
Its a pretty powerful server. Do we need all those cores?


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 6:18 pm 
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Feb 24, 2007 4:14 pm

Posts
6612

Location
United Kingdom

Favourite OS
Server 2012 R2
XDude wrote:
Its a pretty powerful server. Do we need all those cores?

Some people will. Some people need more.

Others just want it to brag :p

_________________
BuildFeed - the ultimate collaborative NT build list - Windows Longhorn - a look at a defining Microsoft project


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 6:32 pm 
Administrator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:47 am

Posts
12410

Location
Merseyside, United Kingdom

Favourite OS
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Bear in mind it won't run Windows or Linux etc. Its designed for Sun hardware and software.

_________________
Image

BetaArchive Discord: https://discord.gg/epK3r6A


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 6:33 pm 
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Feb 24, 2007 4:14 pm

Posts
6612

Location
United Kingdom

Favourite OS
Server 2012 R2
Andy wrote:
Bear in mind it won't run Windows or Linux etc. Its designed for Sun hardware and software.


Yeh. That limits it to what? Solaris?

_________________
BuildFeed - the ultimate collaborative NT build list - Windows Longhorn - a look at a defining Microsoft project


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 6:34 pm 
Administrator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:47 am

Posts
12410

Location
Merseyside, United Kingdom

Favourite OS
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64
hounsell wrote:
Andy wrote:
Bear in mind it won't run Windows or Linux etc. Its designed for Sun hardware and software.


Yeh. That limits it to what? Solaris?


Most likely.

_________________
Image

BetaArchive Discord: https://discord.gg/epK3r6A


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 9:44 pm 
Donator
Offline

Joined
Tue Oct 17, 2006 8:26 pm

Posts
929
Solaris, Linux (Debian, Aurora, Splack, Gentoo), and "the bsd's" (Open/Net/Free).

Out of those, Solaris and Gentoo do not support sparc32, not that any have been built in about a decade. Not to confuse the issue, these are obviously 64-bit sparc processors... I just wanted to throw that extra bit of info out there.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:58 am 
FTP Access
Offline

Joined
Thu Aug 24, 2006 6:28 pm

Posts
352
I keep thinking to myself, "They have all these races and competitions with processors about speed, but they can increase their speed a ton by just making a bigger die. So why the hell don't they?"


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 7:23 am 
Donator
Offline

Joined
Fri Dec 29, 2006 6:40 am

Posts
1513
It's enough to host a large website on it, but not the best idea.
If the motherboard goes boom, its off.
With multi computers, atleast only part of the network will go down.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 8:22 am 
FTP Access
Offline

Joined
Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:13 pm

Posts
130

Location
France
expert01 wrote:
I keep thinking to myself, "They have all these races and competitions with processors about speed, but they can increase their speed a ton by just making a bigger die. So why the hell don't they?"


Because it isn't so easy.
Adding a new core don't actually increase the speed.
You can only run more independant commands per cycle.
So you need to multithread your program and few people know how to do that correctly (and some program cannot be multithread) .


Top  Profile  WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 12 posts ] 




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All views expressed in these forums are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the BetaArchive site owner.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Copyright © 2006-2018

 

Sitemap | XML | RSS