BetaArchive Logo
Navigation Home Screenshots Image Uploader Server Info FTP Servers Wiki Forum RSS Feed Rules Please Donate
UP: 51d, 23h, 54m | CPU: 100% | MEM: 5756MB of 12227MB used
{The community for beta collectors}

Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
 PostPost subject: Apple tells iPhone hackers to shove it        Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 3:42 pm 
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:45 pm

Posts
732

Location
Norway

Favourite OS
HP keystroke RPL
BBC News wrote:
An Apple software update is disabling iPhones that have been unlocked by owners who wanted to choose which mobile network to use.

Earlier this week Apple said a planned update would leave the device "permanently inoperable".

Thousands of iPhone owners hacked their expensive gadget in order to unlock it for use with other mobile carriers and to run a host of unsupported programs.

There are also reports of the update causing issues with unaltered iPhones.

On Monday Apple issued a statement in which it said many of the unauthorised iPhone unlocking programs caused "irreparable damage" to the device's software.

The company said this would "likely result in the modified iPhone becoming permanently inoperable when a future Apple-supplied iPhone software update is installed".

That warning has now proved correct as many owners are reporting their phones no longer work following installation of the update.

Apple iPhone warning proves true
I kind of hoped this would be beneath Apple, but apparently not.

For those who don't know, the US of Awesomeness has the DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act, is that not the most sinister name since the PATRIOT Act?), which prevents hacking hardware and firmware.
This is mostly a direct result of the objectionable way the lobbying firms and senators operate.
Anyway, this bill has a few exceptions, one being that hacking cell-phone firmware to change your operator is legal.
A convenient loop-hole is that there are NO laws againt disabling hacked devices.

So yeah, Apple goes out and screws everyone who wanted to change their desktop-shortcuts or not pay 40 bucks a month to AT&T.

_________________
Let's sperg about hardware
E6410 - i5-560m, 8GB, WXGA+, NVS 3100M, Samsung SSD 830 128GB, WWAN, 9-cell, E-Port Plus Replicator
Desktop - i5-2500k (4.3 GHz TB), 8 GB, HD6950 2GB, 2x24" 1080p, Samsung SSD 830 128GB + 2 TB stripe, Xonar D2X


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 3:52 pm 
Administrator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:47 am

Posts
12465

Location
Merseyside, United Kingdom

Favourite OS
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Lmfao, the iPhone won't sell if they do this. Then who's the laughing stock? Apple should get their act together. Hackers will only find a way around the "block" anyway.

_________________
Image

BetaArchive Discord: https://discord.gg/epK3r6A


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 3:58 pm 
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:06 pm

Posts
2393
Just so it's clear, most of the stuff about "permanently inoperable" is scare tactics from Apple as opposed to Apple - the firmware update just reinstalls a lot of the OS with a new version where the hacks are patched, and so once updated the phone will once again be locked to AT&T and unable to run apps other than those shipped with it by Apple. I think you can also revert the firmware back to the previous version if you don't have an AT&T contract and so the phone is now useless to you (as opposed to "bricked") if you upgraded by mistake, and the update is also optional.

Not letting you run apps beyond what comes with it does seem ridiculous though, very typical Apple there. They should have made a proper Newton successor, even nowadays there's hundreds of apps you can run on your Newton despite them not having been made for years, and as such it can be a pretty useful device still.

_________________
Image


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 4:33 pm 
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:55 pm

Posts
549

Location
UK

Favourite OS
Windows NT 4.0
Another reason why this Sony Ericcson v600i remains in my pocket.

_________________
My Website -
Ecclesia Semper Reformanda Est


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 4:40 pm 
Exactly like Sony. Oh, shure kit the Problems with updates .... Has anybody here really legal PSP Games ? :wink:


Top
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 5:28 pm 
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:16 am

Posts
725

Location
TeXaS

Favourite OS
Windows Vista Beta 1 (6.0.5112)
Apple disappoints me...makes Microsoft look so much better based on the way their handling things....that's just sad.

_________________
Laptop: Precision M6300 2.4GHz Core 2 T8300 / 4GB RAM / 320GB HD / ATI Quadro FX 3600m
Server: PowerEdge 1950 (Gen III) (x1) 2.5Ghz Xeon E5420 / 24GB FB-DDR2 / 1.5tb 7.2k SAS RAID 0
Desktop: Precision T5500 2.66GHz Xeon X5650 / 24GB DDR3 ECC / 2x 300GB Seagate 15k7


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 5:44 pm 
FTP Access
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:06 pm

Posts
2393
4tified wrote:
makes Microsoft look so much better based on the way their handling things

There was one thing that came into my head immediately upon seeing the first unboxing pictures of the iPhone:

Image

_________________
Image


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 4:18 am 
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:19 am

Posts
1915

Location
New Zealand
why do people want to hack them anyway? aren't there cheaper and better products? the only people i can really see wanting these are the people that just want to show off


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:11 am 
Donator
Offline

Joined
Wed Aug 22, 2007 8:42 am

Posts
173

Location
Manchester, UK

Favourite OS
AmigaOS3.9
Nokia FTW :D


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 3:16 pm 
Donator
Offline

Joined
Sat Aug 19, 2006 1:25 am

Posts
590

Location
Israel
Bricking hacked iPhones is not something Apple would do by itself (they never stopped people from installing Linux on iPods), it's something their contract with AT&T would force them to do. Apple, by itself, doesn't care which provider you use, as long as you buy an iPhone and buy songs and videos from the iTunes store. It's AT&T that cares about unlocking.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:19 pm 
Permanently Banned
Offline

Joined
Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:09 am

Posts
463
ppc_digger wrote:
Bricking hacked iPhones is not something Apple would do by itself (they never stopped people from installing Linux on iPods), it's something their contract with AT&T would force them to do. Apple, by itself, doesn't care which provider you use, as long as you buy an iPhone and buy songs and videos from the iTunes store. It's AT&T that cares about unlocking.


Yeah, AT&T want's their profits in their pockets, not T-Mobile's.

When you buy a phone directly from a company, or a 3rd party, you own it. If you do that free phone w/ 2 year contract things, you DON'T own the phone until your contract is up. That's how they pay for the cost of the phone.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:58 am 
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:55 pm

Posts
549

Location
UK

Favourite OS
Windows NT 4.0
Zimmy wrote:
ppc_digger wrote:
Bricking hacked iPhones is not something Apple would do by itself (they never stopped people from installing Linux on iPods), it's something their contract with AT&T would force them to do. Apple, by itself, doesn't care which provider you use, as long as you buy an iPhone and buy songs and videos from the iTunes store. It's AT&T that cares about unlocking.


Yeah, AT&T want's their profits in their pockets, not T-Mobile's.

When you buy a phone directly from a company, or a 3rd party, you own it. If you do that free phone w/ 2 year contract things, you DON'T own the phone until your contract is up. That's how they pay for the cost of the phone.


Thats why I use Pay As You Go, like I topup whenever i want.

_________________
My Website -
Ecclesia Semper Reformanda Est


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 5:11 pm 
Permanently Banned
Offline

Joined
Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:09 am

Posts
463
Compact-mac wrote:
Zimmy wrote:
ppc_digger wrote:
Bricking hacked iPhones is not something Apple would do by itself (they never stopped people from installing Linux on iPods), it's something their contract with AT&T would force them to do. Apple, by itself, doesn't care which provider you use, as long as you buy an iPhone and buy songs and videos from the iTunes store. It's AT&T that cares about unlocking.


Yeah, AT&T want's their profits in their pockets, not T-Mobile's.

When you buy a phone directly from a company, or a 3rd party, you own it. If you do that free phone w/ 2 year contract things, you DON'T own the phone until your contract is up. That's how they pay for the cost of the phone.


Thats why I use Pay As You Go, like I topup whenever i want.


I can't stand pay as you go, it's just too expensive for the amount of calls I make.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject:        Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:18 pm 
Donator
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:55 pm

Posts
549

Location
UK

Favourite OS
Windows NT 4.0
Zimmy wrote:
Compact-mac wrote:
Zimmy wrote:
ppc_digger wrote:
Bricking hacked iPhones is not something Apple would do by itself (they never stopped people from installing Linux on iPods), it's something their contract with AT&T would force them to do. Apple, by itself, doesn't care which provider you use, as long as you buy an iPhone and buy songs and videos from the iTunes store. It's AT&T that cares about unlocking.


Yeah, AT&T want's their profits in their pockets, not T-Mobile's.

When you buy a phone directly from a company, or a 3rd party, you own it. If you do that free phone w/ 2 year contract things, you DON'T own the phone until your contract is up. That's how they pay for the cost of the phone.


Thats why I use Pay As You Go, like I topup whenever i want.


I can't stand pay as you go, it's just too expensive for the amount of calls I make.


I dont use my phone a lot, so thats why i guess.

_________________
My Website -
Ecclesia Semper Reformanda Est


Top  Profile  WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 14 posts ] 




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All views expressed in these forums are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the BetaArchive site owner.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Copyright © 2006-2018

 

Sitemap | XML | RSS