Internet Explorer 9.0.8073.6003 (Win7 x86) Leak

[hounsell]

Sucks that only the x86 leaked. It's one of the older IE9 RC Escrow builds apparently.

Download

[jamieostrich]

Sucks that only the x86 leaked. It's one of the older IE9 RC Escrow builds apparently.

Download

yes, i just found this, if only happybulldozer/winreview gave us the 9.0.8073.6018

Please?

[DeFacto]

too slow, I've found this about 15 min before you...

[hounsell]

too slow, I've found this about 15 min before you...

Ugh, why do people put topics everywhere? It's a new beta, it should be either news or New Betas/RTM...

[DeFacto]

fine, you can move it.

[Spider-Vice]

No, he can delete your topic because he posted in the right location. No need to duplicate topics.

On-topic: Nice, I'm gonna try it.

[DeFacto]

Offtopic Comment

Not only that I found it first, I posted it first, so he made a duplicate. and removing mine would be abuse of his powers as a mod. He would delete mine because I misplaced it and keep his, even though he made a duplicate. But that's not how a mod looks like. No offense, but a search on the board wouldn't hurt, right?

[UltimateGTR]

Let's hope x64 will get leak soon!

[hounsell]

Offtopic Comment

Not only that I found it first, I posted it first, so he made a duplicate. and removing mine would be abuse of his powers as a mod. He would delete mine because I misplaced it and keep his, even though he made a duplicate. But that's not how a mod looks like. No offense, but a search on the board wouldn't hurt, right?

Your topic isn't titled IE9 RC Escrow leak, or even gives any indication to that. I'm not about to look through every IE9 topic in case someone has posted something. Simple fact is if it's in the wrong section, someone will sooner or later post another topic in the correct section.

We have different sections for a reason, to aid organisation. The idea that everyone can just use search is wrong. I'm not about to delete your topic, because it contained further discussion and predates this topic on the basis of it was about more than just this leak. Though that said, the topic itself was originally a duplicate of a correctly placed topic about the 8027 leak.

All in all, posting in the right section helps.

[canouna]

http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/8909/canouna.jpg

6010 x86 x64

[UltimateGTR]

http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/8909/canouna.jpg

6010 x86 x64

Great! I need the x64 one!

[kpo6969]

deleted.

[canouna]

He's has it but won't share.

If I could I would, believe me!

[kpo6969]

deleted.

[harry4567]

Installed the leaked build. And the changes are sigificant too...

[Derf]

If only people weren't selfish. *sigh*

[DeFacto]

If only people weren't selfish. *sigh*

that's one thing. the other is that they're forbidden to leak. for example you work for MS and you leak the IE9 RC build and they find out and kick you out, you lose your job...

[Shane]

Sigh

Always damn X86 leaks

[pkubaj]

[censored], does anyone know whether x64 will leak at last?

[Spider-Vice]

What's the hurry anyway, Flash x64 is still buggy and a browser won't use 4GB of RAM will it?

[UltimateGTR]

What's the hurry anyway, Flash x64 is still buggy and a browser won't use 4GB of RAM will it?

The problem is the people who are using x64 OS need the x64 installer of IE, the OS won't allow x86 installer run. The x64 browser maybe doesn't really matter, but x64 OS supports larger RAM is the key.

[kpo6969]

deleted.

[DeFacto]

9.0.8073.6010 is around, but nowhere to be found.

AFAIK only screenshots leaked, not the actual installer file...

[hb860]

yes, only screens. No build itself was leaked to public.
-------
IE is not a sort of stuff what interesting to test. Its boring.

[tpemail]

The link seems dead now...