Possible Windows 95/98/ME beta or new 9x beta?

Discuss Windows 95, 98 and ME.
Locked
OdysseyNeptune
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 7:54 pm

Possible Windows 95/98/ME beta or new 9x beta?

Post by OdysseyNeptune »

A friend of mine sent me a screenshot. He said it was from a beta, but didn't specify anything.
Is it from a 95/98/ME beta, or a new (possibly planned) 9x OS?
Here is the screenshot:
Image

Overdoze
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 1718
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 10:28 am
Location: Slovenia

Re: Possible Windows 95/98/ME beta or new 9x beta?

Post by Overdoze »

This just looks like a Windows 95 bootscreen with some text edited out.
All roads lead to Neptune™

KRNL386 - my site about retro computing | My site about Windows 1.0 | My blog | 86Box Manager | LeakDB - list of PC OS warez leaks

gabegriggs1
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 307
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 5:29 pm
Location: Michigan. USA
Contact:

Re: Possible Windows 95/98/ME beta or new 9x beta?

Post by gabegriggs1 »

If you share a link to the build itself we can check it out but I'm more than willing to guess it's just an edited Windows 95 boot screen.
"Sometimes when you innovate, you make mistakes. It is best to admit them quickly, and get on with improving your other innovations." - Steve Jobs

Check out my YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqZBjx ... C1dNISF8ZQ

OdysseyNeptune
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 7:54 pm

Re: Possible Windows 95/98/ME beta or new 9x beta?

Post by OdysseyNeptune »

Today he sent the build, but in the Start menu and everything it says Windows 95. Bummer.

ATeamInc
FTP Access
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2018 6:49 pm
Location: GMT+2 w/dst
Contact:

Re: Possible Windows 95/98/ME beta or new 9x beta?

Post by ATeamInc »

OdysseyNeptune wrote:Today he sent the build, but in the Start menu and everything it says Windows 95. Bummer.
What about the build number?
<!--Placeholder-->

Windows OS
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 453
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:43 pm
Location: DLL Hell, United States
Contact:

Re: Possible Windows 95/98/ME beta or new 9x beta?

Post by Windows OS »

At most, it might be a VERY EARLY Nashville or Memphis build, but most likely it's just an modified copy of Windows 95, with the 95 edited out and the gradient replaced with the 98 gradient.

Try to get the build number, both the one reported on System Properties and on the MS-DOS Prompt, but even if the build number is different, it could still be just a modified 95 copy.
Do Not Make Illegal Copies Of This Signature.
YouTube | Twitter | BA Wiki | BetaWiki

AlphaBeta
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 2172
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2012 4:33 pm
Location: Czechia

Re: Possible Windows 95/98/ME beta or new 9x beta?

Post by AlphaBeta »

OdysseyNeptune wrote:A friend of mine sent me a screenshot. He said it was from a beta, but didn't specify anything.
Is it from a 95/98/ME beta, or a new (possibly planned) 9x OS?
Here is the screenshot:
Image
The screenshot is fabricated. Windows 9x stores the boot logo as a 320x400 bitmap, which gets stretched to 640x400 by the video adapter. It does that by duplicating the columns, which means that every two columns must be the same. If you open the image in Photoshop, you can see that this is true for most of the image - except for the part where the "95" numeral would normally be.

See this picture:
Image
You can clearly see the stretch on the Windows word mark and in the clouds above it. It's pretty obvious that the "95" was edited out from an already stretched screenshot.
AlphaBeta, stop brainwashing me immediately!

Image

OdysseyNeptune
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 7:54 pm

Re: Possible Windows 95/98/ME beta or new 9x beta?

Post by OdysseyNeptune »

Oh. Winver reports 4.0.999. That's Nashville, correct?

Random_User
User avatar
Donator
Posts: 1136
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:48 am

Re: Possible Windows 95/98/ME beta or new 9x beta?

Post by Random_User »

No, the leaked Nashville build has version number 4.10.999

Also, that's in System Properties -- not winver

Windows OS
User avatar
FTP Access
Posts: 453
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:43 pm
Location: DLL Hell, United States
Contact:

Re: Possible Windows 95/98/ME beta or new 9x beta?

Post by Windows OS »

So... yeah, it was a very bad fake lol, probably made by someone who only knew that Nashville's build number was 999, but knew nothing else about it.
Do Not Make Illegal Copies Of This Signature.
YouTube | Twitter | BA Wiki | BetaWiki

Locked