[REQUEST] Windows Longhorn Build 3790.1232
Forum rules
Please read the following rules before posting a download request in this area:
1. Don't post a request if you have under 10 posts as stated in the rules. If you do anyway, it will be deleted without further notice.
2. Requests for anything against our rules will not be entertained and you will be warned.
3. Check that we don't already have the file on our FTP servers by using the database linked in the navigation.
Please read the following rules before posting a download request in this area:
1. Don't post a request if you have under 10 posts as stated in the rules. If you do anyway, it will be deleted without further notice.
2. Requests for anything against our rules will not be entertained and you will be warned.
3. Check that we don't already have the file on our FTP servers by using the database linked in the navigation.
-
coltonspleen
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 5:59 pm
[REQUEST] Windows Longhorn Build 3790.1232
Is there any links of which I can find this beta? Because I actually like build 4074, and I would like to try out this build. I already know it's essentially Server '03 SP1, so can someone please help me out?
Re: [REQUEST] Windows Longhorn Build 3790.1232
None, get FTP access.
-
Lukas Marsik
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 4:14 pm
Re: [REQUEST] Windows Longhorn Build 3790.1232
Here it iscoltonspleen wrote:Is there any links of which I can find this beta? Because I actually like build 4074, and I would like to try out this build. I already know it's essentially Server '03 SP1, so can someone please help me out?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0dVZ7 ... sp=sharing
Re: [REQUEST] Windows Longhorn Build 3790.1232
Offtopic Comment
@Lukas: I think you shall better PM the OP rather than posting the link here, because such links got taken down by google(trust me,I once shared an office beta on my google drive and they took it down shortly after due to DMCA. It wasn't even cracked!) (not trying to backseat mod.)
-
oscareczek
- Posts: 700
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 5:37 pm
- Location: Poland
Re: [REQUEST] Windows Longhorn Build 3790.1232
Offtopic Comment
This build isn't interesting at all, just Server 2003 with SKU converted to XP Pro and changed EULA.
-
coltonspleen
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 5:59 pm
Re: [REQUEST] Windows Longhorn Build 3790.1232
I know it isn't, just I would like to (@ the very least) try it out.
Re: [REQUEST] Windows Longhorn Build 3790.1232
you will get more annoyed by errors and 0 day activation than
enjoying trying it out
enjoying trying it out
-
coltonspleen
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 5:59 pm
Re: [REQUEST] Windows Longhorn Build 3790.1232
Meh. There's an AntiWAT with the ISO anyways, if they haven't been stripped already.
Offtopic Comment
70th post! 
Re: [REQUEST] Windows Longhorn Build 3790.1232
then you have nothing there to see
-
coltonspleen
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 5:59 pm
Re: [REQUEST] Windows Longhorn Build 3790.1232
I don't care. I'll use it anyway, because I feel like it.
-
coltonspleen
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 5:59 pm
Re: [REQUEST] Windows Longhorn Build 3790.1232
Is this build 32-bit or 64-bit, because I don't want to be emulating the wrong architecture, and messing up the whole virtual OS.
Offtopic Comment
75th post!
-
Lukas Marsik
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 4:14 pm
Re: [REQUEST] Windows Longhorn Build 3790.1232
You are not emulating. You are virtualizing. It's a 32-bit OS but selecting 64-bit in the virtualizer would make no difference to how the OS works.coltonspleen wrote:Is this build 32-bit or 64-bit, because I don't want to be emulating the wrong architecture, and messing up the whole virtual OS.Offtopic Comment75th post!
-
coltonspleen
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 5:59 pm
Re: [REQUEST] Windows Longhorn Build 3790.1232
I figured that out before you posted so disregard the post you replied to.Lukas Marsik wrote:You are not emulating. You are virtualizing. It's a 32-bit OS but selecting 64-bit in the virtualizer would make no difference to how the OS works.coltonspleen wrote:Is this build 32-bit or 64-bit, because I don't want to be emulating the wrong architecture, and messing up the whole virtual OS.Offtopic Comment75th post!