Are these 95 builds true?

Post by **fexuaz555** » Tue May 26, 2015 5:44 am

Some OS-Checklists have 213 chinese, 230 korean (known that seok has this), 944 korean (Seok has this), 6xx builds , 576.
Are these builds true?

these builds' citation is Battler's topic at http://www.betaarchive.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=10178

P.s ) 225 KOREAN (from 431 SDK), 429 Korean (from 435 SDK), 466 Korean (from 484 SDK) Exists, because they contained SDK.

Post by **Overdoze** » Tue May 26, 2015 5:52 am

Old checklists are wildly inaccurate, best to avoid them.

Post by **MicroBetaMan** » Tue May 26, 2015 9:41 pm

OBattler's checklist looks pretty accurate... since then, have these builds been leaked to BA? Even though I don't have FTP, I'm curious about it myself!

Post by **Battler** » Tue May 26, 2015 10:02 pm

Please avoid that checklist. It's way outdated, and mentions several highly doubtful builds as if they were real, with no evidence to back up the claims.

A more accurate version of that list is now an online PHP page and is being built at: http://forum.softhistory.org/buildlist.php .

Are these 95 builds true?

Are these 95 builds true?

Re: Are these 95 builds true?

Re: Are these 95 builds true?

Re: Are these 95 builds true?