View topic - vista build 6000 stability/speed/resource usage? - Windows, Apple, Application, Abandonware and Game Beta Downloads/Repository

Deathwarder

As the title states, I am looking for information about the rtm build's speed, stability, and resource usage. Is anyone currently using it?

cooled

it is a nuked release and one group that i know of has a perfect release for the x86. Google for a AIO :wink:

.

___ · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Mon Nov 13, 2006 6:05 am

how is it nuked?

longview · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Mon Nov 13, 2006 6:26 am

The one I got off the FTP was very fast compared to RC1, it's using about 500-600 mb ram right now and uses about 6 gig disk space (Vista Ultimate).

Can't say too much about stability, only used it for a few hours, but pretty decent performance, installed all my drivers except webcam, which Windows Update installed afterwards.

cooled · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Mon Nov 13, 2006 9:40 am

its nuked because it was modified with 5840 files and 5744 files.

Vista Ultimate R2 · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Mon Nov 13, 2006 9:44 am

cooled wrote:

its nuked because it was modified with 5840 files and 5744 files.

Quite a few people seem to be saying the BillGates release was modified from the original, but how exactly? Which files are not the right ones? It seems to install and run fine.

longview · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Tue Nov 14, 2006 12:25 am

Some files are not 6000, like
secproc.dll - 6.0.5840.16389
newdev.dll - 6.0.5054.0

Both in System32.

Kind of weird, why would anyone modify a release like this except to fix bugs?

Vista Ultimate R2 · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Tue Nov 14, 2006 1:09 am

longview wrote:

Some files are not 6000, like
secproc.dll - 6.0.5840.16389
newdev.dll - 6.0.5054.0

Both in System32.

Kind of weird, why would anyone modify a release like this except to fix bugs?

Are they build 6000 files on the non-BillGates release though? Sometimes a few files slip through with old build numbers, for instance take a look at main.cpl in System32 on XP SP2:

Copyright (C)

Microsoft Corp. 1991-1999 [XP files say -2001]
Product Name: Microsoft(R) Windows (R)

2000 Operating System
Product Version: 5.1.2403.1 [a Whistler Beta build number]

cooled · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Tue Nov 14, 2006 2:39 am

also there are files from 5744 if you look hard enough. also comparing the real wim to the billgates wim you would realize that the billgates wim is a bit off.

Virtualball · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Tue Nov 14, 2006 6:21 am

well, back on topic, how is the speed compared to the RC2 release?

Deathwarder · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Wed Nov 15, 2006 9:42 am

what about the one on andy's server?

empireum · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Wed Nov 15, 2006 7:53 pm

Which one do you mean? The AIO DVD or the other release? The AIO DVD claims to be "100% RTM", where the other release in the "Vista RTM" folder which is about 2.4GB (it's the BillGates release, right?) seems to contain some older files.

Deathwarder · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Wed Nov 15, 2006 10:46 pm

The one on Andy's ftp server, I think it is a 52 rared iso with the name vistartm

empireum · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Wed Nov 15, 2006 11:02 pm

This is the "nuked" BillGates release that's supposed to have some files from 5840 and even 5744. The Vista AIO DVD that's on Andy's ftp as well should be 100% build 6000.

vista build 6000 stability/speed/resource usage?

Who is online