View topic - So, we're on the new server, whats the speed like? - Windows, Apple, Application, Abandonware and Game Beta Downloads/Repository

m4rkuz · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Thu Jan 03, 2008 8:32 am

My ping is now again better:

~25

Ping wird ausgefhrt fr ip.betaarchive.co.uk [91.121.17.201] mit 32 Bytes Daten:

Antwort von 91.121.17.201: Bytes=32 Zeit=27ms TTL=117

Antwort von 91.121.17.201: Bytes=32 Zeit=26ms TTL=117

Antwort von 91.121.17.201: Bytes=32 Zeit=26ms TTL=117

Antwort von 91.121.17.201: Bytes=32 Zeit=25ms TTL=117

Ping-Statistik fr 91.121.17.201:

Pakete: Gesendet = 4, Empfangen = 4, Verloren = 0 (0% Verlust),

Ca. Zeitangaben in Millisek.:

Minimum = 25ms, Maximum = 27ms, Mittelwert = 26ms

lisiuwah · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Thu Jan 03, 2008 8:34 am

Emm... I cant really feel it, i'm from HK..

thenico · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Thu Jan 03, 2008 8:45 am

From my other server:

Quote:

nico@server:~$ mtr --report -c 4 www.betaarchive.co.uk
HOST: server Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. 192.168.0.1 0.0% 4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.0
2. 82.246.130.254 0.0% 4 37.1 36.9 36.8 37.1 0.2
3. 213.228.38.190 0.0% 4 37.3 37.2 36.8 37.4 0.3
4. marseille-6k-1-po8.intf.rout 0.0% 4 37.9 37.8 37.4 37.9 0.2
5. lyon-6k-1-v804.intf.routers. 75.0% 4 42.4 42.4 42.4 42.4 0.0
6. ??? 100.0 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
7. ??? 100.0 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
8. 020G.gsw-2-6k.routers.ovh.ne 50.0% 4 56.9 53.3 49.6 56.9 5.1
9. 020G.rbx-2-6k.routers.ovh.ne 25.0% 4 52.8 54.1 52.8 56.5 2.1
10. rbx-4-m1.routers.ovh.net 0.0% 4 61.6 61.2 60.2 62.3 0.9
11. roubaix.betaarchive.co.uk 0.0% 4 52.6 52.9 52.6 53.5 0.4
nico@server:~$ mtr --report -c 4 sillyproject.com
HOST: server Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. 192.168.0.1 0.0% 4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.0
2. 82.246.130.254 0.0% 4 37.2 37.2 37.0 37.4 0.2
3. 213.228.38.190 0.0% 4 36.9 37.1 36.9 37.5 0.3
4. marseille-6k-1-po8.intf.rout 25.0% 4 37.8 37.9 37.8 38.0 0.1
5. ??? 100.0 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
6. th2-crs16-1-be1100.intf.rout 75.0% 4 49.2 49.2 49.2 49.2 0.0
7. ??? 100.0 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
8. 020G.gsw-2-6k.routers.ovh.ne 25.0% 4 55.5 51.7 49.2 55.5 3.3
9. 020G.rbx-2-6k.routers.ovh.ne 50.0% 4 59.2 55.9 52.6 59.2 4.7
10. rbx-30-m1.routers.ovh.net 0.0% 4 52.7 53.0 52.7 53.1 0.2
11. ns29013.ovh.net 0.0% 4 53.4 53.4 52.3 55.3 1.4

DanielC · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Thu Jan 03, 2008 9:30 am

Ok, how about this then, ping from the SP server ...

Quote:

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping betaarchive.co.uk

Envoi d'une requête 'ping' sur ip.betaarchive.co.uk [91.121.17.201] avec 32 octe
ts de données :

Réponse de 91.121.17.201 : octets=32 temps<1ms TTL=125
Réponse de 91.121.17.201 : octets=32 temps<1ms TTL=125
Réponse de 91.121.17.201 : octets=32 temps<1ms TTL=125
Réponse de 91.121.17.201 : octets=32 temps<1ms TTL=125

Statistiques Ping pour 91.121.17.201:
Paquets : envoyés = 4, reçus = 4, perdus = 0 (perte 0%),
Durée approximative des boucles en millisecondes :
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Moyenne = 0ms

So yea, HA! ... lol ...

Andy · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Thu Jan 03, 2008 9:38 am

Lmao! <1ms, nice!

DanielC · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Thu Jan 03, 2008 9:43 am

Now all you have to do is get server to pong my server.

Then we can have a fast game of ping pong ...

Ok, I'll get me coat --> [] Exit

... lolz ...

happy dude · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Thu Jan 03, 2008 9:55 am

UGh, god damn it... going thru LA to get here!

Quote:

Tracing route to ip.betaarchive.co.uk [91.121.17.201]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 3 ms 3 ms 2 ms 192.168.1.1
2 23 ms 24 ms 24 ms lo5000.bras2.adl1.adnap.net.au [122.49.191.6]
3 22 ms 23 ms 19 ms g3-10.cor1.adl1.adnap.net.au [219.90.143.141]
4 23 ms 36 ms 22 ms vlan444.o5rxc76f000.optus.net.au [59.154.56.1]
5 221 ms 195 ms 200 ms 203.208.145.82
6 192 ms 194 ms 194 ms if-1-1.mcore3.LAA-LosAngeles.teleglobe.net [216.
6.84.17]
7 268 ms 268 ms 268 ms if-4-0.mcore3.NJY-Newark.teleglobe.net [216.6.84
.2]
8 273 ms 273 ms 274 ms 216.6.97.37
9 347 ms 346 ms 345 ms if-12-0.core3.PG1-Paris.teleglobe.net [80.231.72
.113]
10 346 ms 343 ms 344 ms if-11-1.har1.PG1-Paris.teleglobe.net [80.231.73.
66]
11 * 353 ms 347 ms 010G.th1-1-6k.routers.ovh.net [213.186.32.241]
12 363 ms 362 ms * 020G.rbx-1-6k.routers.ovh.net [213.186.32.194]
13 367 ms 387 ms 365 ms 213.251.191.7
14 362 ms 362 ms 360 ms roubaix.betaarchive.co.uk [91.121.17.201]

I blame Telstra...most of this country's net problems are their fault...did I say most? I mean all

pr0gram the pr0grammer · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Thu Jan 03, 2008 9:56 am

Looking at the site today, it felt only very slightly slower ... so I did some ping flooding to see if it wasn't just me:

Old Server
Ping statistics for 208.77.45.58:
Packets: Sent = 40, Received = 40, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 200ms, Maximum = 376ms, Average = 246ms

New Server
Ping statistics for 91.121.17.201:
Packets: Sent = 40, Received = 40, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 388ms, Maximum = 532ms, Average = 427ms

Oh well, it's a bit slower for Aussies, but tis okay

Quote:

I blame Telstra...most of this country's net problems are their fault...did I say most? I mean all

QFT

Kenneth · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:35 am

Old Server

Quote:

Pinging 208.77.45.58 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 208.77.45.58: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=117
Reply from 208.77.45.58: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=117
Reply from 208.77.45.58: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=117
Reply from 208.77.45.58: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=117

Ping statistics for 208.77.45.58:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 63ms, Maximum = 67ms, Average = 65ms

New Server

Quote:

C:\>ping betaarchive.co.uk

Pinging ip.betaarchive.co.uk [91.121.17.201] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=137ms TTL=114
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=133ms TTL=114
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=135ms TTL=114
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=138ms TTL=114

Ping statistics for 91.121.17.201:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 133ms, Maximum = 138ms, Average = 135ms

SillyProject

Quote:

C:\>ping sillyproject.com

Pinging sillyproject.com [91.121.97.22] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 91.121.97.22: bytes=32 time=136ms TTL=115
Reply from 91.121.97.22: bytes=32 time=132ms TTL=115
Reply from 91.121.97.22: bytes=32 time=133ms TTL=115
Reply from 91.121.97.22: bytes=32 time=136ms TTL=115

Ping statistics for 91.121.97.22:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 132ms, Maximum = 136ms, Average = 134ms

happy dude · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Fri Jan 04, 2008 5:32 am

Oh yay...

Quote:

C:\Documents and Settings\user>ping betaarchive.co.uk

Pinging ip.betaarchive.co.uk [91.121.17.201] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=353ms TTL=110
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=511ms TTL=110
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=472ms TTL=110
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=431ms TTL=110

Jeff · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Fri Jan 04, 2008 7:36 pm

Retried, getting around 110ms here. Pretty fast for going almost half way around the world...

empireum · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Fri Jan 04, 2008 7:51 pm

Code:

PING ip.betaarchive.co.uk (91.121.17.201): 56 data bytes
bytes from 91.121.17.201: icmp_seq=0 ttl=120 time=22.132 ms
bytes from 91.121.17.201: icmp_seq=1 ttl=120 time=18.986 ms
bytes from 91.121.17.201: icmp_seq=2 ttl=120 time=18.624 ms
bytes from 91.121.17.201: icmp_seq=3 ttl=120 time=22.183 ms

happy dude · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:46 pm

Code:

Pinging ip.betaarchive.co.uk [91.121.17.201] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=387ms TTL=111
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=352ms TTL=111
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=355ms TTL=111
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=450ms TTL=111

Ping statistics for 91.121.17.201:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 352ms, Maximum = 450ms, Average = 386ms

I dont think its gonna get better for me

Luckie · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:12 am

the speed is great and my PING is 30ms

mewrox99 · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:50 am

i'm getting a mere 876ms

New Zealand DSL Sux

sevan · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:37 am

Quote:

Pinging ip.betaarchive.co.uk [91.121.17.201] with 32 bytes

Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=116
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=116
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=95ms TTL=116
Reply from 91.121.17.201: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=116

Ping statistics for 91.121.17.201:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 93ms, Maximum = 95ms, Average = 94ms

Not bad, I don't have a comparisont though.

So, we're on the new server, whats the speed like?

Who is online