View topic - Gallery of Unleaked Builds - Windows, Apple, Application, Abandonware and Game Beta Downloads/Repository

Andrew Tapferke

linuxlove

Andrew Tapferke wrote:

*removed*

Fake.

Andrew Tapferke wrote:

http://www.betaarchive.com/imageupload/1214740622.or.78696.jpg

On the BA Wiki.

iBetaTosh

http://www.betaarchive.com/imageupload/ ... r.9754.jpg

Probally 5058.

TheCollector1988

4072 is a known fake

Andrew Tapferke

Fixed, sorry guys.

linuxlove

Andrew Tapferke wrote:

5011 Server 2003

http://www.betaarchive.com/imageupload/ ... .58741.png

I'm also pretty sure that this is either the Windows Research Kernel or NTOSDrop and not a "real" build.

(whoops, accidentally messed up your thread! that's what i get for clicking in the general direction of the Quote button...)

prayaas1998

Adding screens of unleaked builds is not allowed, right?

Andrew Tapferke

prayaas1998 wrote:

Adding screens of unleaked builds is not allowed, right?

They're (were) taken from the Image Gallery.

prayaas1998

O.K. Sorry for my comment.

DeFacto

This topic is a bad idea...

Andrew Tapferke

DeFacto wrote:

This topic is a bad idea...

To finish your idea, please add an argument

DeFacto

Potential flamewars etc. due to certain screenshots. But that's just my opinion.

Taylorover9000 · 6.1.7850

DeFacto wrote:

Potential flamewars etc. due to certain screenshots. But that's just my opinion.

Its not like he has them.

Panda X

4067's shot is fake.

Icon labels, fonts, navigation buttons, GNCAddict's frames, and the animated preview pane aurora never extended into the menu bar but rather used a fading gradient overlay on top of the aurora making it fade into the menu bars which were solid.

Raiker

4044

never saw those screenshots except the one where two screens are merged together. Where are they from?

5086

Quote:

http://www.betaarchive.com/imageupload/1214740365.or.96113.jpg

fake. look at the build tag - winmain.idx02 and not winmain_idx02.

TheCollector1988

6519.1 fbl looks fake to me.

DeFacto

Taylorover9000 wrote:

Its not like he has them.

It's not like I had that in mind... 8-)

But anyway...

Panda X

Raiker wrote:

4044

never saw those screenshots except the one where two screens are merged together. Where are they from?

I can't remember exactly but I found those same screenshots on some website back in 2009.

rafaelgs

4067 Longhorn, looks great.

IsaacD

Ah, the good old days of Longhorn.

When one would create or make a fake of a LH Screenshot, people actually put the effort in making it look great, sometimes the way you could tell if it was a fake was when it was too good.

Thankyou 'Drew, it was good looking at these again, been a long long while.

reekilynn

4028 has been on the ftp(the win server 08 gallery)
5712 is in the international folder.

Andrew Tapferke

Raiker wrote:

4044

never saw those screenshots except the one where two screens are merged together. Where are they from?

5086

Quote:

http://www.betaarchive.com/imageupload/1214740365.or.96113.jpg

fake. look at the build tag - winmain.idx02 and not winmain_idx02.

Fixed. They're all from BetaArchive's Image Gallery

.
@IsaacD: happy to help

Panda X

rafaelgs wrote:

4067 Longhorn, looks great.

Probably because it's fake. That 4057 fake also looked good, but also faked.

giantsteen

How can we ever tell what real or fake is anymore?

Panda X

giantsteen wrote:

How can we ever tell what real or fake is anymore?

Consistency is the best way. Logical progression would be the next best (as in something being completely different in that one specific "build" and never seen right before that specific build and never afterwards).

For example I keep pointing out 4067.

There's just too many inconsistencies to even believe that build is real. As for the others, they don't really have anything specific to make it obvious that they're fake if they even are.

Gallery of Unleaked Builds

Who is online