Post subject: Re: Longhorn X (aka Longhorn 10.0) Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 6:17 pm
Newbie Beta Collector
Joined Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:57 pm
Posts 18
Location Estonia
Favourite OS Longhorn 4074
The project that does NOT HAVE a funny name. And, as I see, that it's really wanted, I guess it's good ? I hope I'll hear about it when it's ready to go.
//ex. project with funny name- Windows RG SP453 build_12_e9876(ReallyGood)
Post subject: Re: Longhorn X (aka Longhorn 10.0) Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 6:53 am
Pro Beta Collector
Joined Thu Nov 26, 2009 9:32 pm
Posts 367
Favourite OS Windows 7 Ultimate RTM x64
I never said the project would have a funny name. o_O
Anyways, possible change of plans. I'll be experimenting with different things for the project. One of them may be to use Server 2003 and the WRK and make a sort of "Longhorn" build while still having it be partially a cloud OS.
Post subject: Re: Longhorn X (aka Longhorn 10.0) Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:46 pm
Newbie Beta Collector
Joined Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:57 pm
Posts 18
Location Estonia
Favourite OS Longhorn 4074
betacollector21 wrote:
crreature wrote:
The project that does NOT HAVE a funny name.
Who said the project had a funny name? Or did I miss something...
No, haha, what I really ment was that, I see alot of projects that have funny names. My friend once made a Windows 98 ReallyGood (RG) edition, so thats kinda funny, but this is even better than "Vista" or whatever thing (I hate vista, the one they released). Altho I think Mac has OS X, so some of Mac lovers may me angry, and the design can be compared to the OS X (a little).
Anyway, sorry for my bad English. And sorry if I messed with your minds.
Post subject: Re: Longhorn X (aka Longhorn 10.0) Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 5:22 am
Pro Beta Collector
Joined Thu Nov 26, 2009 9:32 pm
Posts 367
Favourite OS Windows 7 Ultimate RTM x64
It uses Windows Server 2003 as a core. .NET will be included so you can use vb.net if you want
EDIT: The first winmain build! It doesn't have much and it isn't anywhere near release, but this is the first unified build with all three SKUs (Personal, Professional, Server).
Post subject: Re: Longhorn X (aka Longhorn 10.0) Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 2:05 pm
Amateur Beta Collector
Joined Tue Feb 02, 2010 5:58 pm
Posts 153
Favourite OS Windows 7 Build 7601 SP1
Undefined wrote:
It uses Windows Server 2003 as a core. .NET will be included so you can use vb.net if you want
EDIT: The first winmain build! It doesn't have much and it isn't anywhere near release, but this is the first unified build with all three SKUs (Personal, Professional, Server).
Here's a screenshot of Longhorn X Professional: -Image removed-
Sadly, networking is broken in this build.
Is the aero from this build from a theme or was a program needed?
Post subject: Re: Longhorn X (aka Longhorn 10.0) Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 5:29 pm
Pro Beta Collector
Joined Thu Nov 26, 2009 9:32 pm
Posts 367
Favourite OS Windows 7 Ultimate RTM x64
Leapo wrote:
Is there a download link for this anywhere yet? Would like to test it out.
Nope, not yet. It's still in early development
21stcenturyrahi wrote:
Undefined wrote:
It uses Windows Server 2003 as a core. .NET will be included so you can use vb.net if you want
EDIT: The first winmain build! It doesn't have much and it isn't anywhere near release, but this is the first unified build with all three SKUs (Personal, Professional, Server).
Here's a screenshot of Longhorn X Professional: -Image removed-
Sadly, networking is broken in this build.
Is the aero from this build from a theme or was a program needed?
TrueTransparency with a custom skin. Newest build also has a transparent, black taskbar with a plain white Windows logo.
Post subject: Re: Longhorn X (aka Longhorn 10.0) Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 11:29 pm
Pro Beta Collector
Joined Thu Nov 26, 2009 9:32 pm
Posts 367
Favourite OS Windows 7 Ultimate RTM x64
Samuka wrote:
Well, this is WRK kernel running on Longhorn, or server 2003 with new version and build?
WRK running on Server 2003, not Longhorn. If you'll read the first post, I said that it's not Longhorn based, although understandably the merge may have caused confusion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
All views expressed in these forums are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the BetaArchive site owner.