View topic - Windows Beta Serials - Windows, Apple, Application, Abandonware and Game Beta Downloads/Repository

HakerPL · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Thu Apr 19, 2007 3:10 am

Hello,
Win 95 "Chicago", tested with builds 117, 122, 189, 224:

Beta Site ID: 101907
Password: 999b70c9e

Andy · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Thu Apr 19, 2007 3:14 am

HakerPL wrote:

Hello,
Win 95 "Chicago", tested with builds 117, 122, 189, 224:

Beta Site ID: 101907
Password: 999b70c9e

This is for where?

empireum · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Thu Apr 19, 2007 3:15 am

IIRC it asks for that during the install. You have to enter these.

Andy · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Thu Apr 19, 2007 3:17 am

empireum wrote:

IIRC it asks for that during the install. You have to enter these.

Ah OK. It wasn't made clear. It looked like a login for a website which was not provided.

empireum · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Thu Apr 19, 2007 3:20 am

Yes, I know. But when I installed Chicago, I think, #117 it said something along the lines of "You need to be an authorized MS beta tester to use this software, please verify blah blah..." That's where this comes in handy.

HakerPL · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Thu Apr 19, 2007 3:25 am

You have to enter the password to dialog box

Or you will get error...

MCbx · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Fri Apr 20, 2007 12:14 am

There is another way to get around this protection: you have to boot your computer from a special bootdisk, which contains pre-installed Chicago system. Setup won't ask you for beta numbers!

Luckie · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Fri Apr 20, 2007 12:56 am

MCbx wrote:

There is another way to get around this protection: you have to boot your computer from a special bootdisk, which contains pre-installed Chicago system. Setup won't ask you for beta numbers!

can you provide sich a disc?

Frozenport · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Sat Apr 21, 2007 1:43 pm

On another tangent... does anybody have a serial for the rare 4074 x64 edition that was given away at some collage campuses...

The ISO was on Dazzix's server back in the day...

MCbx · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Tue Apr 24, 2007 5:19 am

This is floppy image supplied with Windows Chicago build 73G.

From Release's NFO

Quote:

(...) This fix of 73g does'nt ask for a beta sight
ID number or Password number if used with the boot-disk supplied. If
you install it as an upgrade on Win3x and need a number it is as such (...)

When I used this floppy, Chicago hadn't asked for beta IDs. But it is possible, that there are some modifications in Windows Chicago itself, for example in installer's INI files.

Uploaded to bandogo.com, available: http://www.badongo.com/file/2854316

Luckie · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Tue Apr 24, 2007 5:48 am

thx for the disc

XDude · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Sun Apr 29, 2007 1:36 am

Aztech wrote:

Ludacris wrote:

XDude wrote:

4033 leaked from osba used TCP8W, the c0d3rz leak used the CKY24 key

... where is the difference between this 2 builds?

From memory one of them had a different setupp.ini & pidgen.dll, not
the original one.
Which of the 2 I cannot remember at the moment, but I do remember
wondering that myself when either of them leaked & did a quick check
myself.

although this was a while, I can tell that the osba leak was the orginal, c0d3erz had modifly the 2 files like winbeta did to 4051 and whoever leaked 4053 had that modification. If anyone evry gets a gold of the MSDN 4051 x86 will know that it takes the TCP8W key not CKY24.
But the TCP87W key was not leaked at that time, therefore modifcations are equire to install with an old key.

Quote:

On another tangent... does anybody have a serial for the rare 4074 x64 edition that was given away at some collage campuses...

4074 x64 should take the TCP8W key, if it was MSDN orginal. I believe that the build around around in the old days took the TCP8W key.

Now, does anyone have the ultra-rare 4051 MSDN iso?

fzajac · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Sun Apr 29, 2007 2:03 am

XDude wrote:

Now, does anyone have the ultra-rare 4051 MSDN iso?

You mean lab04 or main lab?

Ludacris · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:52 pm

Why dont we just provide a list with all the known leake (even if provate) and then you can ask if ynyone has this or that build..
btw. has anyone 4050.

Xammer · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Sun Apr 29, 2007 6:49 pm

For a list of all known leaks see the Newest Microsoft OS Checklist by tpemail.

Ludacris · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Tue May 29, 2007 9:24 pm

Hey. the FGQQD-FDFWC-P276Q-GXHGW-4JPJM key also works for Longhorn 4008

atomcomputer · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:21 am

Hello,
I'm looking for the 3531 serial of Whistler ;-)

Namronia · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:48 am

HakerPL wrote:

Hello,
Win 95 "Chicago", tested with builds 117, 122, 189, 224:

Beta Site ID: 101907
Password: 999b70c9e

build 117?

hounsell · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:50 am

Namronia wrote:

HakerPL wrote:

Hello,
Win 95 "Chicago", tested with builds 117, 122, 189, 224:

Beta Site ID: 101907
Password: 999b70c9e

build 117?

That's Interesting, It's not supposed to be leaked...

Namronia · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:05 am

if youve got it, please leak

Matt A. Tobin · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Thu Jul 05, 2007 11:31 pm

Here is a trick for remembering what to set your date to if your installing whistler find the date of a file on the iso and add a few months to it

Yes I know its simple but some people who aren't eXPerienced with betas might know to turn their date back but not know to what :-D

Back in the day after they expired when I revisited the old betas thats what I did through trial and error before i knew of OSBA

KenOath · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Fri Jul 06, 2007 12:32 am

Matt A. Tobin wrote:

Here is a trick for remembering what to set your date to if your installing whistler find the date of a file on the iso and add a few months to it

Yes I know its simple but some people who aren't eXPerienced with betas might know to turn their date back but not know to what :-D

Back in the day after they expired when I revisited the old betas thats what I did through trial and error before i knew of OSBA

Might work on most builds, won't work on 2202 \ 2211...
The NT5.cat appears to run out 3 weeks after it was compiled on these
builds, attempting to install after the 3 week window just errors everytime...

I found the date that the NT5.cat was dated ( after extracting it ) to be
the best time to install the Whistler betas...
Personal experience based on un-modified original ISO's that is...

Matt A. Tobin · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Fri Jul 06, 2007 3:06 am

KenOath wrote:

Matt A. Tobin wrote:

Here is a trick for remembering what to set your date to if your installing whistler find the date of a file on the iso and add a few months to it

Yes I know its simple but some people who aren't eXPerienced with betas might know to turn their date back but not know to what :-D

Back in the day after they expired when I revisited the old betas thats what I did through trial and error before i knew of OSBA

Might work on most builds, won't work on 2202 \ 2211...
The NT5.cat appears to run out 3 weeks after it was compiled on these
builds, attempting to install after the 3 week window just errors everytime...

I found the date that the NT5.cat was dated ( after extracting it ) to be
the best time to install the Whistler betas...
Personal experience based on un-modified original ISO's that is...

That is a precise way of doing it, very cool thanks

Oerg · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Sun Jul 15, 2007 3:55 am

Hi,

does Memphis need a serial?

Greets
Oerg

hounsell · **Post subject:** **Posted:** Sun Jul 15, 2007 3:58 am

Yes, there is a list on Andy's server, in the file Memphis BETA key.rar, on download 2 on the old server...

Windows Beta Serials

Who is online