BetaArchive Logo
Total Current Archive Size: 4765.54GB in 15409 files
Navigation Home Screenshots Image Uploader Server Info FTP Servers Wiki Forum RSS Feed Rules Please Donate
UP: 12d, 0h, 28m | CPU: 13% | MEM: 6271MB of 12279MB used
{The community for beta collectors}

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 PostPost subject: Re: Differences between checked and free builds        Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 2:02 pm 
Newbie Beta Collector
Newbie Beta Collector
Offline

Joined
Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:47 am

Posts
46

Location
Russia

Favourite OS
Windows XP checked build
Win2003srv x64 I have found in a network, didn't look yet, and here x86 haven't got while. With MSDN to swing it will not turn out, sponsors aren't present *hehe*

Has found recently WinXP chk, 2 hours I wait, when 3rd will be put servicepack

Image


Top  Profile  ICQ
 PostPost subject: Re: Differences between checked and free builds        Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 12:59 pm 
Newbie Beta Collector
Newbie Beta Collector
Offline

Joined
Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:47 am

Posts
46

Location
Russia

Favourite OS
Windows XP checked build
Now I look on Windows XP Media Center edition 2002 Checked/debug - anything outwardly doesn't differ from usual Windows XP, except SP. It can not MCE? Disk label - X1APCHK_EN

Image


Top  Profile  ICQ
 PostPost subject: Re: Differences between checked and free builds        Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 3:20 pm 
1337 Beta Collector
1337 Beta Collector
Offline

Joined
Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:30 pm

Posts
1605
Disk 1 of WinXP Media Center Edition is WinXP Professional, disk 2 is with the Media Center components ...


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re:        Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 8:16 am 
Guru Beta Collector
Guru Beta Collector
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:24 am

Posts
613

Favourite OS
Sigma OS 3, Win8 RP WM-Edition
kontini wrote:


How to remove watermark from desktop after installing XP SP3 Checked build?

_________________
Image
DeskImg - Easy way to change desktop background on Windows 8 Beta's
Powered by: MAXtoriX


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Differences between checked and free builds        Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2011 7:54 pm 
Newbie Beta Collector
Newbie Beta Collector
Offline

Joined
Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:51 am

Posts
11

Favourite OS
8102
How do you remove watermarks for these checked build?


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Differences between checked and free builds        Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2011 8:16 pm 
1337 Beta Collector
1337 Beta Collector
Offline

Joined
Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:56 am

Posts
6087
You can't.

_________________
Goodbye.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Differences between checked and free builds        Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 12:18 pm 
Amateur Beta Collector
Amateur Beta Collector
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Sat Feb 12, 2011 12:12 pm

Posts
198

Favourite OS
Windows 8 RTM 9200
What about updates? Are all update for the free build also published for the checked builds? And do they come through windows update?

_________________
If ur a pirate, say arrr!


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Differences between checked and free builds        Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2012 7:24 pm 
1337 Beta Collector
1337 Beta Collector
Offline

Joined
Thu Dec 30, 2010 7:25 pm

Posts
1419
Since checked builds are not intended for production environments, I don't think so.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Differences between checked and free builds        Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 10:42 pm 
Newbie Beta Collector
Newbie Beta Collector
Offline

Joined
Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:04 pm

Posts
26
Daniel wrote:
When the free build discovers correctable problems, it continues to run.

Urrrh, that's not the case at all; free builds have no such checks. Checked builds on the other hand make use of ASSERT and NT_ASSERT macros to allow developers to place checks on certain expressions and if they evaluate to false, allow the option to break in to a debugger for example. Checked builds also contain any additional code included inside of #if DBG directives that can perform further tasks the developer chooses.

Daniel wrote:
The checked build distribution medium contains the checked version of the operating system, plus checked versions of
HALs, drivers, file systems, and even many user-mode components.

I would change that to be most user-mode components. Those components that wouldn't be compiled using a checked environment would be those that are binaries supplied by other teams outside of the Windows division or that vendors have supplied or those that perform sensitive tasks such as licensing protection or security or MPEG decoding as examples.

You can check if a system is running a checked kernel by looking at the value of certain global variables. In earlier versions of NT, the variable was ExBuildVersion, in newer versions it's NtBuildNumber.

kd> dd nt!ExBuildVersion l 1
801a6d70 f00001ff

If you look at the value in more detail, you'll see it actually contains two parts. If the first part is an 'f', it's a free build. If it's a 'c', then it's a checked build. The second part shows the actual build number. In this case, it's 511 which is the RTM version of Windows NT 3.1.

You also don't need to install the complete checked build, you can copy across only the binaries of interest. It might be that you only need a checked build of ntoskrnl.exe and hal.dll or then you might only need a checked version of a user-mode component you're troubleshooting.

If you check the Microsoft Knowledge Base, a few components are documented for which using a checked build will supply additional tracing information. For the other components, it is purely a choice made by the developer as to what steps are required to "turn on" additional features of checked components. Some components require no configuration and will generate tracing information by default. Others you need to add entries to INI files, the registry, start the component using a different command line or even break in with a debugger and change global variables.

Most of the problems with having to use checked components just to obtain tracing information go away as components start to use Event Tracing for Windows which was first included in Windows 2000.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Differences between checked and free builds        Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 6:47 pm 
Newbie Beta Collector
Newbie Beta Collector
Offline

Joined
Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:38 am

Posts
21

Favourite OS
3683
I've never used checked builds, only the free builds.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Differences between checked and free builds        Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:15 am 
Pro Beta Collector
Pro Beta Collector
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Wed Jun 22, 2011 10:27 am

Posts
376

Location
In my defined location.

Favourite OS
2428,1411,612
What about 9x?

_________________
Multimedia Fusion 2 App Developer


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject: Re: Differences between checked and free builds        Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:52 pm 
1337 Beta Collector
1337 Beta Collector
Offline

Joined
Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:56 am

Posts
6087
What about it? Windows 9x also has Free and Check/Debug builds.

_________________
Goodbye.


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Differences between checked and free builds        Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:55 pm 
1337 Beta Collector
1337 Beta Collector
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Wed Feb 23, 2011 12:11 am

Posts
2834

Location
Italy

Favourite OS
NT Oct91, Dec91, XP 2509
even Windows 3.1 has a checked build. (Included in the SDK)

_________________
Tutorials, Video Games, Windows, basically geeky stuff!


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject: Re: Differences between checked and free builds        Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 8:58 am 
Newbie Beta Collector
Newbie Beta Collector
Offline

Joined
Tue Oct 16, 2012 8:29 am

Posts
1

Favourite OS
002
fine ,thinks!




_____________________________________________________
I like video games and online games,the site is http://www.topgw2gold.com/.


Top  Profile  WWW
 PostPost subject: Re: Differences between checked and free builds        Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 1:29 pm 
Amateur Beta Collector
Amateur Beta Collector
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Thu Mar 29, 2012 3:56 am

Posts
185

Location
Cebu City, Philippines

Favourite OS
Windows 8 Pro with Media Center
Well...., thanks for your information.

_________________
shhh... let's not leak our hard work


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Differences between checked and free builds        Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:40 am 
Guru Beta Collector
Guru Beta Collector
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:24 am

Posts
613

Favourite OS
Sigma OS 3, Win8 RP WM-Edition
Image

Both 32 and 64-bit Longhorn 4051 Checked/Debug ISOs are broken, has someone workable copies?

More details/proofs of testing here.

_________________
Image
DeskImg - Easy way to change desktop background on Windows 8 Beta's
Powered by: MAXtoriX


Top  Profile
 PostPost subject: Re: Differences between checked and free builds        Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 8:35 am 
Newbie Beta Collector
Newbie Beta Collector
User avatar
Offline

Joined
Sat Mar 02, 2013 1:06 pm

Posts
25

Location
Yunnan

Favourite OS
win95+win98+winME+XP+win7+win8+…
why some OS when installed ,the product ID count OEM,but it still have to active????


Top  Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All views expressed in these forums are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the BetaArchive site owner.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Copyright © 2006-2013

 

Sitemap | XML | RSS