Post subject: Re: Longhorn 4002 lab06_N (ntvbl06) Screenshots Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 6:45 am
Guru Beta Collector
Joined Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:17 am
Posts 940
Favourite OS 6.0.5219
Ciastex wrote:
Panda X wrote:
Ciastex wrote:
@up It's lab06 build, so it could be interesting, at least from shell side.
Not all lab06's are as glorious as everyone makes them out to be.
Why so pessimistic? Every build is worth testing. Also, finding any interesting stuff is fun. At least for me.
But... As for now it's sealed and we can only stare at pics
It's not pessimistic, it's realistic. Look at the last Longhorn leak of 4042. People stopped caring about almost instantly. Not to mention it's not going to be all that different than 4008 which has already leaked.
Post subject: Re: Longhorn 4002 lab06_N (ntvbl06) Screenshots Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 6:50 am
Pro Beta Collector
Joined Thu Jul 01, 2010 1:08 pm
Posts 397
Location Over here!
Favourite OS AMI BIOS
Panda X wrote:
Ciastex wrote:
Panda X wrote:
Ciastex wrote:
@up It's lab06 build, so it could be interesting, at least from shell side.
Not all lab06's are as glorious as everyone makes them out to be.
Why so pessimistic? Every build is worth testing. Also, finding any interesting stuff is fun. At least for me.
But... As for now it's sealed and we can only stare at pics
It's not pessimistic, it's realistic. Look at the last Longhorn leak of 4042. People stopped caring about almost instantly. Not to mention it's not going to be all that different than 4008 which has already leaked.
But why are you applying this to everyone? I still have 4042 on HDD as a 2nd Windows and I'm still not bored with it. TBH I even started creating custom frames for Aero.
_________________ Helping you help us help you help us all. 21686148-6449-6E6F-744E-656564454649
Post subject: Re: Longhorn 4002 lab06_N (ntvbl06) Screenshots Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 7:48 am
Site Moderator
Joined Sat Feb 24, 2007 4:14 pm
Posts 5829
Location United Kingdom
Favourite OS Server 2012
Ciastex wrote:
@up It's lab06 build, so it could be interesting, at least from shell side.
It's Lab06_n, rather than Lab06. _n signifies that it's actually where Lab06 code is prepared to merge with the main branch, so it's not as featured/unstable (depending on your point of view) as a true Lab06 build.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
All views expressed in these forums are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the BetaArchive site owner.