Well, I decided to return to the previous build that I said that was sluggish, has more features and is more polished in a way. The Power and the input tablet shell work. Among other things. I'll make some adjustments and I'll upload it

Well, there is a odd menu bug in some applications, like Chrome, see -

I like it so much because it installs even audio during setup, no LH can do that in VM. The Input Language should be changed as linuxlove said, also, CaptainPeanut reported the typo and the Image Viewer is in PT-BR, can we get the EN-US one? This is how the previewer looks now -


But still, I this system, keep up the great work, I really like it because of the fast WIM-Stage setup!

I keep getting this error while trying to install in vmware is there a way around it.


http://www.betaarchive.com/imageupload/ ... r.8063.PNG

The problem with Windows Photo Gallery in Portuguese was to be forgotten, since the original version of the Shorthorn was en directly, and now I'm planning to apply through the mui pack. I have plans to move Vista Longhorn beta 1 or Shell in 4074 and the much as Possible to make it faster.
The big difference is That You Can things Longhorn, with the compatibility of XP / Server 2003.

I have plans to use this wim Method setup is complete hardware abstraction for XP/2003, with phase two of the Longhorn Could you guys see.
I think if I carry the shell consegurir Vista beta 1 or longorn 4074 will be near the end.

5048 Longhorn's interface is very pretty, and the problem of chrome is known Already, because of the theme used in 5048, unfortunately I think Difficult to correct.
I said to, but it has many beautiful problems!
It has a limit of 50 files, I walked around, but Often the start menu items disappear, Sometimes the not close the windows and Often the labels of the icons disappear from my computer and the link does not open it. Furthermore, it is slow to draw the window. Finally, the interface will have to be above or equal to That of 4074 by taking the 5048 for Windows to be usable

Someone here knows reverse engineering? I wanted to fix the Longhorn Shell From 5048 and I need help ...

you can run your DLLs through REC or Boomerang.

It won't install in Virtualbox, there's graphical glitches, possibly involving the resolution.
Everything is stretched into a very thin horizontal line.

Edit:
It would probably install, but there's a graphical glitch, no other problem.

After conversations with people of this community, I realized how selfish they are and that builds unleakeds abound, but nobody wants to release them. So if anyone prove me the opposite, probably will not provide anything to the public, Sumirei this community. And the Shorthorn disappeared. Anyway, I hope someone can prove me the opposite, otherwise, all pay somehow

Unleaked builds are (nearly) everywhere, but you need to know where to get 'em, and that's not easy.
It's [censored] hard to get your hands to one, and that's why most people keep those for themselves.

People who have contacted, and asked only files, not the isos, and they denied me. I want the files to a greater good, why do not know how corrgir up to circumvent the mistakes of 5048. But think it is due mean and I'm more a beta collector that only likes to admire his collection of operating systems and never use them. It is unfortunate selfishness in people. But if there are good souls in this world betaarchive, send pm to me on builds 5058, 5059 or 5060, not to think of myself, but for our community. Know, I run much danger as anybody. NO NEED TO ISOS, only a mere files!

Edit: Project Shorthorn is cloded for the this public.

Don't let those a-holes discourage you. The easiest way to do it would be to make due with what you have rather than strive to get what you dont have. Dont just give up on it.

[quote="Samuka":[censored]]I want the files to a greater good, why do not know how corrgir up to circumvent the mistakes of 5048. But think it is due mean and I'm more a beta collector that only likes to admire his collection of operating systems and never use them. It is unfortunate selfishness in people.
Edit: Project Shorthorn is cloded for the this public. (Sic)[/quote:[censored]]

Ah the irony in this post.



My Quotations are censored? This is weird

Well, I said that the project is closed by that I do not see much interest in the public betaarchive get it. I from the beginning of this project dreamed of making it public, accessible to all who wanted an option to Windows Vista / 7.
I know people who managed to put the WDDM in 2003 kernel, and prefer to remain silent and not help anyone. Just to get an idea, that would solve the problem of DX10 in XP/2003. But anyway, I do not know how to fix the problems of 5048, would require an extreme reverse engineering. If you want this project to continue, better speak now.

After all, I managed to stabilize over the Explorer and makes it faster and put many other functions ... But many people find my project "futile"

So just because some people say its futile doesn't really mean it is or not. Its an opinion, dont take it too far. Also, take Apple for example. In the days on Windows 95 and 98, Mac didn't really have alot of interest put in it, but Apple just pressed on and pressed on. So even if it is gonna capture the interest on a small group of people or even one person, its better than none isn't it?

Um, no offence, but I think that modifying Windows is illegal. Check it out on Microsoft's website.

I also never actually use my virtual machines, I just admire them. But every once in a while I use them.

Since when is customizing an operating system illegal?

It's a real shame that the project is closed to this public. You shouldn't let the a-holes of the world discourage you. If you can keep this project going, I for one would give it my full support and can't see see why anybody wouldn't. It's a great thing you are doing here and if I had been on this forum before you closed this project, I would have completely supported you.

Second this!

CPCookieMan

Third This!

Do you see? There will always be people who are going to be downers and say your project is futile or stupid, but then there is the other set of people; the ones who you want to actually benefit from the project; who will support you. If you just close the project, you are screwing yourself and everybody else who supports you. Do yourself and everybody else a favor and keep up the project.

Well, I'll keep the project, but he will undergo a makeover. I'll give my blood to get to port the interface in Longhorn 4074 or 4093, which are faster, more efficient, and with fewer bugs than the 5048. I hope to get it in a few months. I'm doing a rebuild with Windows Server 2003 completely converted to XP Professional, someone is interssado? (Using WinPE and install.wim)

4074 would be your best bet in my opinion, as I heard 4093 is considered highly unstable. Now thats not to say the parts you're gonna use from it are stable enough, but its your OS.
Besides, Slate would look great on it.

ShortHorn looks great!! Being that it is now private, you aren't giving links anymore, are you..?

This is the total conversion of Server 2003 to XP Professional. Here are some screens:









It uses the Longhorn setup engine. I do this with all builds of Longhorn I have, but I can not guarantee issue of issues, since almost all builds of Longhorn pre-reset uxthemes appear to be incompatible with Server 2003 SP2. Anyone can send pm but notice that it is only a test version originally from microsoft, I'm not responsible for the use. Applies only for 180 days as Server 2003 original.